ANC 62.1%
Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)
- ANC 62.1%
- ActionSA 10.5%
- EFF 6.5%
- Others 20.8%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 39 562 valid votes
ANCAfrican National Congress24 57562.1%
ActionSA4 14910.5%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters2 5916.5%- LIMALimpopo Independent Movement Alliance1 7134.3%
- IndependentIndependent candidates1 5684.0%
DADemocratic Alliance1 3383.4%- SACPSouth African Communist Party6791.7%
COPECongress of the People6761.7%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party4271.1%- AKANIAfrican Rising Movement3240.8%
BOSABuild One South Africa2680.7%- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement2390.6%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus2350.6%- LIRALimpopo Residents Association1950.5%
AHCAfrican Heart Congress1210.3%- Mopani Residents AssociationMopani Residents Association1190.3%
APCAfrican People's Convention700.2%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania400.1%
AFPAfrican Freedom Party350.1%
UCDPUnited Christian Democratic Party330.1%
PAPatriotic Alliance310.1%
MSMMagoshi Swaranang Movement260.1%
GLCGazankulu Liberation Congress200.1%
ARAAfrica Restoration Alliance190.0%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement180.0%
AADPAction Alliance Development Party180.0%
UATUnited Africans Transformation130.0%
IRCInternational Revelation Congress120.0%
ALJAMAAl Jama-ah100.0%
ESP app
How long is the queue?
Chat about the election in your area
ESP app
How did Greater Letaba vote?
Get notified when it's declared
Hours off in Greater Letaba ?
Reported in the ESP app
2011 Ward 18, Greater Letaba in 2026 ?
No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.
Wards · 30
- Ward 3ANC 63.4%
- Ward 9ANC 64.2%
- Ward 15ANC 59.7%
- Ward 11 of 4 voting districts inANC 71.5%
- Ward 23 of 4 voting districts inANC 70.4%
- Ward 54 of 6 voting districts inANC 86.7%
- Ward 61 of 4 voting districts inANC 83.4%
- Ward 73 of 6 voting districts inANC 56.8%
- Ward 82 of 4 voting districts inANC 47.5%
- Ward 103 of 4 voting districts inANC 75.5%
- Ward 112 of 5 voting districts inANC 57.2%
- Ward 123 of 5 voting districts inANC 50.2%
- Ward 133 of 4 voting districts inANC 55.9%
- Ward 141 of 4 voting districts inANC 53.4%
- Ward 163 of 5 voting districts inANC 58.3%
- Ward 173 of 5 voting districts inANC 75.6%
- Ward 182 of 4 voting districts inANC 49.4%
- Ward 193 of 5 voting districts inANC 69.9%
- Ward 204 of 5 voting districts inANC 71.5%
- Ward 214 of 5 voting districts inANC 52.3%
- Ward 223 of 4 voting districts inANC 61.9%
- Ward 231 of 6 voting districts inANC 48.9%
- Ward 243 of 5 voting districts inANC 63.3%
- Ward 255 of 6 voting districts inANC 66.6%
- Ward 261 of 4 voting districts inANC 76.0%
- Ward 272 of 6 voting districts inANC 50.0%
- Ward 282 of 5 voting districts inANC 63.9%
- Ward 294 of 5 voting districts inANC 36.5%
- Ward 303 of 5 voting districts inANC 58.1%
- Ward 4–
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 7 823 · 80 of 138 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 80 voting districts with results so far here (40 429 of 78 539). The IEC publishes 35.9%.
Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 518 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2222); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 964 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3278); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (495); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (465); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2904); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (456); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (479); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1468 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3414); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 568 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2363); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (264); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 568 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1985); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (575); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (466); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (277); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 524 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2019); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 446 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1324); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1326 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3980); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (568); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 184 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (606); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (507); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2102: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3622); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (504); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 523 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2560); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (592); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (757); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 731 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2888); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (415); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (332); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (199); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 692 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 237 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (728); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (382); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (303); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 237 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1403); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (260); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1518 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4201); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 706 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1894); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 724 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2244); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (495); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (390); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 879 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2623); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (436); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 589 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2235); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 462 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1279); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (269); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 857 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3396); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (393); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (379); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1751 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5026); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (579); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (264); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3688); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 309 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (958); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (749); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (737); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (376); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1328 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3794); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (658); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (569); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (927); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (547); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2102: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 877 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3042); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (760); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (446); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (462); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1525 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4557); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 369 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1098); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 265 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (798); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1523: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 376 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2183); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (495); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 546 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1922); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 381 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1296); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (299); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 390 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1838); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 645 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2525); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 425 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1273); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 330 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1063); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (532); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (489); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 873 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3125); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (594); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (672); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (433); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: the IEC's published turnout for this municipality is 35.89%; its own counts give 51.48% (PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in its voting districts); we show the calculated figure.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 15:47 SAST.