ANC 60.8%
Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)
- ANC 60.8%
- ActionSA 12.3%
- EFF 7.4%
- Others 19.6%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 59 650 valid votes
ANCAfrican National Congress36 24060.8%
ActionSA7 33012.3%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters4 4187.4%
DADemocratic Alliance3 7436.3%- IndependentIndependent candidates2 9675.0%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1 1441.9%- LIMALimpopo Independent Movement Alliance6071.0%
- GAZAGaza Democratic Front4350.7%
- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement4330.7%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party3860.6%
RISERise Mzansi2930.5%- SACPSouth African Communist Party2810.5%
APCAfrican People's Convention2500.4%
COPECongress of the People2130.4%
UATUnited Africans Transformation1830.3%
AADPAction Alliance Development Party1490.2%
PAPatriotic Alliance750.1%
AFPAfrican Freedom Party590.1%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party540.1%
KCDPKingdom Covenant Democratic Party540.1%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party490.1%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania400.1%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement380.1%
ALJAMAAl Jama-ah360.1%- EIAEmpathy in Action320.1%
- AAMAmandla Awethu Movement290.0%
- Mopani Residents AssociationMopani Residents Association250.0%
- LIRALimpopo Residents Association240.0%
UCDPUnited Christian Democratic Party180.0%
ACPAll Citizens Party150.0%- MCMMzansi Citizens’ Movement150.0%
GLCGazankulu Liberation Congress70.0%
IRCInternational Revelation Congress50.0%- FISAFreedom in South Africa30.0%
ESP app
How long is the queue?
Chat about the election in your area
ESP app
How did Greater Tzaneen vote?
Get notified when it's declared
Hours off in Greater Tzaneen ?
Reported in the ESP app
2000 Ward 3, Greater Tzaneen in 2026 ?
No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.
Wards · 35
- Ward 2ANC 70.5%
- Ward 3ANC 79.6%
- Ward 25ANC 71.9%
- Ward 15 of 8 voting districts inANC 81.2%
- Ward 44 of 5 voting districts inANC 63.3%
- Ward 55 of 6 voting districts inANC 56.9%
- Ward 62 of 5 voting districts inANC 71.1%
- Ward 74 of 7 voting districts inANC 74.5%
- Ward 84 of 7 voting districts inANC 67.5%
- Ward 95 of 6 voting districts inANC 71.7%
- Ward 104 of 5 voting districts inANC 49.6%
- Ward 114 of 6 voting districts inANC 51.9%
- Ward 124 of 7 voting districts inANC 75.6%
- Ward 135 of 7 voting districts inANC 56.1%
- Ward 145 of 6 voting districts inANC 53.8%
- Ward 153 of 4 voting districts inDA 38.0%
- Ward 165 of 7 voting districts inANC 38.3%
- Ward 172 of 7 voting districts inANC 52.4%
- Ward 181 of 3 voting districts inIndependent 51.8%
- Ward 192 of 5 voting districts inANC 61.2%
- Ward 202 of 4 voting districts inANC 76.2%
- Ward 211 of 2 voting districts inANC 67.6%
- Ward 226 of 7 voting districts inANC 49.3%
- Ward 233 of 6 voting districts inANC 86.9%
- Ward 242 of 6 voting districts inANC 64.8%
- Ward 262 of 7 voting districts inANC 57.4%
- Ward 271 of 3 voting districts inANC 57.0%
- Ward 285 of 7 voting districts inANC 59.1%
- Ward 294 of 6 voting districts inANC 62.0%
- Ward 303 of 4 voting districts inANC 66.4%
- Ward 313 of 5 voting districts inANC 48.7%
- Ward 324 of 5 voting districts inANC 38.1%
- Ward 333 of 5 voting districts inANC 61.1%
- Ward 342 of 6 voting districts inANC 47.4%
- Ward 354 of 6 voting districts inANC 58.4%
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 7 452 · 128 of 199 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 128 voting districts with results so far here (58 372 of 117 965). The IEC publishes 45.6%.
Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3513); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (357); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1874 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5604); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 291 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (839); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (758); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (307); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6331); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (498); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (475); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (278); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1388 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4346); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (417); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (376); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (269); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1498: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2102: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1463 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4793); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 295 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1013); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (829); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1498: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2102: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 946 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3319); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (502); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (470); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1346 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4021); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 275 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (843); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1211 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3637); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 346 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1021); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1368 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4113); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 289 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (839); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (457); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1450 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4743); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 652 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2013); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (784); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1498: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 841 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2528); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 586 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1729); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (374); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1027 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3585); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (408); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 991 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2977); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 379 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1137); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 217 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (664); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 575 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1730); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (703); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (265); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 901 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2554); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 675 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2038); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 403 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1230); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (659); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (444); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 469 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1425); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 328 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1069); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (701); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (292); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 355 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1178); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 329 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2018); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (344); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (306); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1498: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2102: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 513 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1559); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (368); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (264); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1498: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 600 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1786); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 558 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2704); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (612); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (265); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2102: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1367 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5241); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (603); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (557); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1498: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2102: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1537 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4587); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (242); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 474 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1410); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (391); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1498: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1898 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5670); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 429 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1298); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (521); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 306 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1066); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1498: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2102: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 407 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1808); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 255 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1061); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1012 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3136); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 291 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (853); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (552); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1293 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3903); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 453 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1347); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (384); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (303); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1498: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3463); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 333 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (968); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (340); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 473 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1409); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 319 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (958); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (370); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2191: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2102: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 802 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2558); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 557 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1650); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 370 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1176); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (409); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1498: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1070 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3189); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 295 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (912); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 245 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (730); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 529 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1817); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (370); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (331); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1893: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 930 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2799); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 288 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (838); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (736); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2064: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1728: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2108: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1281: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1131: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2153: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1091: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: the IEC's published turnout for this municipality is 45.62%; its own counts give 49.48% (PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in its voting districts); we show the calculated figure.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 16:36 SAST.