Lephalale

special votes 3 741 · 79 of 84 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 79 voting districts with results so far here (34 430 of 70 924). The IEC publishes 47.4%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 732 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 308 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (948); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (719); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (533); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (461); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 758 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2365); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 451 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1383); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 309 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (883); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (678); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2037: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3715); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 451 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (808); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (610); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2037: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1060 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3094); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 392 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 352 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1095); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (602); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (277); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2037: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1443 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4408); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 307 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (929); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (468); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (426); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (420); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2037: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1082 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (672); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (466); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (305); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1774 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 443 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 296 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (929); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (670); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (428); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1909 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5812); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 467 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (816); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (442); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (335); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2037: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1314 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3899); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 313 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (875); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (350); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2037: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1013 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3095); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (502); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (395); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (416); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2037: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1831 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5454); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 537 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1635); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (446); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (404); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3802); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 308 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (959); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 272 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (819); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (379); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2037: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 546 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1555); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 453 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1643); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 273 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (836); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (360); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2037: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 755 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 682 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1884); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 403 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (712); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (380); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (242); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2037: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1045 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2996); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 324 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (992); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (657); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (465); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3207: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1508: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2037: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 11:07 SAST.