Modimolle-Mookgophong

special votes 5 186 · All 59 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 59 voting districts here (32 089 of 60 045). The IEC publishes 54.5%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 922 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2822); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 809 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2394); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 558 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1656); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 195 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (583); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (406); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 609 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1836); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 340 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1003); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 332 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1002); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (648); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (362); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 869 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2562); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 715 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 424 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1279); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 336 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1032); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (394); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (321); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 997 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3032); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 275 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (813); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 221 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (654); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1399 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4076); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 804 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2534); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 343 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1024); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3842); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 463 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1285); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 378 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (633); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (436); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1004 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2999); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 315 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (879); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 288 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (845); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (408); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (293); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1245 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3773); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 323 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (921); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (644); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (535); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 804 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 544 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1647); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 336 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1014); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (374); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 887 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2686); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 310 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1031); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (489); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (368); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (369); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 977 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2859); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 817 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2366); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 353 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1089); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (306); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2444 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6612); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 691 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (473); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3696); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 239 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (738); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (619); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (305); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 810 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2456); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 351 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1054); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (743); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (596); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 07 Nov 2026, 02:17 SAST.