ANC 41.6%
Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)
- ANC 41.6%
- OTM 21.9%
- EFF 10.7%
- Others 25.8%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 67 143 valid votes
ANCAfrican National Congress27 89941.6%- OTMOn the Move14 70721.9%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters7 20410.7%
DADemocratic Alliance6 6349.9%- SACPSouth African Communist Party4 0376.0%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1 5892.4%- IndependentIndependent candidates8741.3%
- DBPDitirelo Bathong Party6741.0%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania5440.8%- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement3560.5%
AHCAfrican Heart Congress3370.5%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party3130.5%
UATUnited Africans Transformation2650.4%
MSMMagoshi Swaranang Movement2590.4%
APCAfrican People's Convention2390.4%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement1990.3%
AZAPOAzanian People's Organisation1930.3%
UDMUnited Democratic Movement1790.3%
OHMOrganic Humanity Movement1270.2%- FISAFreedom in South Africa1020.2%
A.C.C.Alliance of Citizens for Change780.1%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party630.1%
PAPatriotic Alliance540.1%- TRUTHTruth and Solidarity Movement540.1%
- LBKPLekwe Bepe Kingdom Party480.1%
ALJAMAAl Jama-ah430.1%- MOSHABIMoshabi Party390.1%
- GFSAGap Fixers of South Africa320.0%
- BPBathobohle Political Party10.0%
ESP app
How long is the queue?
Chat about the election in your area
ESP app
How did Mogalakwena vote?
Get notified when it's declared
Hours off in Mogalakwena ?
Reported in the ESP app
Wards · 32
- Ward 1ANC 53.2%
- Ward 4ANC 54.1%
- Ward 6ANC 57.5%
- Ward 12OTM 36.9%
- Ward 17ANC 47.4%
- Ward 18ANC 41.9%
- Ward 20ANC 42.9%
- Ward 21ANC 32.9%
- Ward 22ANC 32.0%
- Ward 24ANC 42.4%
- Ward 27ANC 30.0%
- Ward 28ANC 39.3%
- Ward 29ANC 40.4%
- Ward 30ANC 36.4%
- Ward 31DA 53.6%
- Ward 27 of 8 voting districts inANC 37.8%
- Ward 35 of 7 voting districts inANC 42.5%
- Ward 512 of 14 voting districts inANC 47.7%
- Ward 79 of 10 voting districts inANC 62.3%
- Ward 87 of 9 voting districts inANC 47.0%
- Ward 97 of 8 voting districts inANC 54.7%
- Ward 106 of 10 voting districts inANC 62.4%
- Ward 118 of 9 voting districts inANC 57.5%
- Ward 135 of 6 voting districts inANC 45.0%
- Ward 145 of 9 voting districts inANC 48.3%
- Ward 154 of 7 voting districts inANC 62.6%
- Ward 165 of 7 voting districts inANC 42.8%
- Ward 198 of 9 voting districts inANC 50.5%
- Ward 236 of 7 voting districts inOTM 40.9%
- Ward 257 of 8 voting districts inANC 37.9%
- Ward 264 of 5 voting districts inANC 36.8%
- Ward 325 of 6 voting districts inDA 42.3%
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 7 734 · 202 of 231 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 202 voting districts with results so far here (68 170 of 143 028). The IEC publishes 47.4%.
The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.
Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3362); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 508 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1496); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (452); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (357); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (349); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 860 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2645); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 691 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1978); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 447 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1344); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (337); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 661 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1944); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 367 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (553); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 339 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (951); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (302); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (649); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1018 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3039); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 333 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (983); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (635); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (339); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 999 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3080); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 330 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (983); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 302 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (894); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (523); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (481); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3612); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 308 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (915); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 207 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (593); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (553); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1484 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4587); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 314 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (978); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (498); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (316); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 767 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2316); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 445 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1350); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (304); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 979 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2959); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 508 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1519); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (355); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (339); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 839 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2507); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (639); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (533); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3482); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 276 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (850); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (658); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (434); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (401); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 904 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2754); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 764 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2245); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (674); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (594); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (351); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 750 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2250); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 529 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1597); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (358); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (242); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 674 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1986); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 403 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1210); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (467); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (254); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 547 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1649); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (348); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (293); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 487 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1518); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (730); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (322); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3489); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 792 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2367); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (710); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (369); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 969 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2971); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 782 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2369); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (653); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (375); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3910); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 765 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2357); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (519); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (491); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1020 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3162); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 907 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2673); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (541); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 951 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3239); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 742 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2288); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 368 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1440); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (447); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 778 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2391); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 612 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1874); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 357 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (969); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 211 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (663); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (480); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (278); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 929 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2776); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 675 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1943); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (650); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (622); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3493); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 523 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1603); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 339 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (956); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 297 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (959); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (562); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 759 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2319); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 629 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1885); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (745); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (405); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 715 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2443); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 464 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1337); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 384 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1309); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (491); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (390); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 596 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1890); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 458 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1330); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 431 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1265); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (519); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (352); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 895 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2717); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 691 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2051); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 273 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (802); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (600); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3551); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 957 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2831); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 236 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (735); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 227 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (671); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (305); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (260); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 833 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2537); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 566 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1745); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 325 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (973); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 236 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (652); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (602); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1367: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2039: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1666 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4721); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 661 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2010); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 342 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1101); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (712); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (428); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 854 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2515); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 463 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1366); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 330 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1046); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 236 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (679); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 3249: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 11:50 SAST.