Thabazimbi

special votes 3 376 · All 58 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 58 voting districts here (24 496 of 54 566). The IEC publishes 45.1%.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 819 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 585 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1727); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 435 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1547: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1020 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3046); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 701 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2099); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (421); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1547: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 296 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (957); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (473); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (496); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (393); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (357); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 864 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2561); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 523 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1615); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 397 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 340 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (999); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (537); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (572); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (256); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1547: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 401 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (809); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 195 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (587); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 281 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (855); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (639); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (318); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1547: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 608 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1667); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 416 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1640); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (307); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (460); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (267); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (370); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1547: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 966 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3039); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 404 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1233); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 341 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (986); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 305 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1011); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (392); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (549); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (540); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (417); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (404); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (286); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 907 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2759); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 734 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (573); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (521); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1547: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 711 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 357 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1056); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 300 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (924); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (702); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 207 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (603); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1547: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2083: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 565 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1736); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 255 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (760); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (370); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (445); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (399); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1547: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1993: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1867: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1012 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3013); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 296 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (882); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (805); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (940); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1850: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (527); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1066: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (428); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1547: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2055: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1853: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2084: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2157: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2062: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 12:09 SAST.