Thulamela

Ward 1: ANC 83.6%Ward 2: ANC 77.6%Ward 3: ANC 70.6%Ward 4: 6 of 7 voting districts in, ANC 67.2% so farWard 5: 3 of 9 voting districts in, ANC 70.6% so farWard 6: ANC 43.2%Ward 7: ANC 78.0%Ward 8: ANC 78.0%Ward 9: 5 of 6 voting districts in, ANC 62.2% so farWard 10: ANC 72.9%Ward 11: 6 of 7 voting districts in, ANC 78.1% so farWard 12: 2 of 5 voting districts in, ANC 81.3% so farWard 13: ANC 62.4%Ward 14: ANC 70.0%Ward 15: 7 of 8 voting districts in, ANC 63.8% so farWard 16: 5 of 8 voting districts in, ANC 62.6% so farWard 17: ANC 63.2%Ward 19: 7 of 9 voting districts in, ANC 63.9% so farWard 20: ANC 59.9%Ward 21: 6 of 7 voting districts in, ANC 66.7% so farWard 22: ANC 42.3%Ward 23: 6 of 7 voting districts in, ANC 55.7% so farWard 24: ANC 75.0%Ward 25: ANC 73.8%Ward 26: 4 of 5 voting districts in, ANC 46.4% so farWard 27: 4 of 5 voting districts in, ANC 76.4% so farWard 28: 6 of 7 voting districts in, ANC 80.5% so farWard 29: 3 of 5 voting districts in, ANC 59.8% so farWard 30: ANC 81.8%Ward 31: ANC 76.2%Ward 32: 2 of 4 voting districts in, ANC 86.2% so farWard 33: ANC 82.8%Ward 34: 3 of 7 voting districts in, ANC 68.8% so farWard 35: not in yetWard 36: 4 of 6 voting districts in, ANC 65.8% so farWard 39: 6 of 9 voting districts in, ANC 65.8% so farWard 40: 4 of 5 voting districts in, ANC 67.7% so farWard 41: ANC 65.0%Ward 18: ANC 77.5%Ward 37: 3 of 4 voting districts in, ANC 78.5% so farWard 38: 3 of 4 voting districts in, ANC 75.2% so far
WardsANC 40Partly counted 21No results, yetdarker = bigger win
Dashed: 2011 Ward 38 (2011 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too
200020062011201620212026

ANC 69.0%

Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · Ward ballot
  • ANC 69.0%
  • IRC 5.9%
  • EFF 5.3%
  • Others 19.8%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Thulamela227 of 271 voting districts in
19 of 41 wards complete
Turnout so far43.7%
Voters on the roll so far235k
South Africa · Counting22 349 of 23 696 voting districts in (94.3%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 93 534 valid votes

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Thulamela vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Thulamela ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power498hours off47 outages
Water7hours off1 outage
Internet0hours offNo outages
May · Power: 30 hours offMay: 30 hours off30MayJun · Power: 28 hours offJun: 28 hours off28JunJul · Power: 32 hours offJul: 32 hours off32JulAug: 0 hours off0AugSep · Power: 181 hours offSep: 181 hours off181SepOct · Power: 228 hours offOct · Water: 7 hours offOct: 235 hours off235Oct

2011 Ward 38, Thulamela in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 41

On EskomSePush

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 10 140 · 227 of 271 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 227 voting districts with results so far here (94 295 of 215 719). The IEC publishes 40.6%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1918 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5749); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1394: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1990 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5743); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (519); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1394: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (311); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2057 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 432 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (408); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (334); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1891 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5930); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 336 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1031); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (630); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 853 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2891); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (458); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1394: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1576 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4949); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1501 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (326); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1394: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (415); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1887 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5710); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 301 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (849); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6414); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 242 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (666); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1478 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4502); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 401 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 184 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (515); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (279); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1394: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1837 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5522); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (370); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (308); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1696 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5037); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (442); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 635 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1675 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4395); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 544 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1475); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 259 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (599); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1394: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1989 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6080); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 308 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (879); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (354); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (308); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1394: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1433 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 426 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1050); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1394: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1506 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4589); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 289 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (697); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 195 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (562); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (388); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1394: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1588 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4867); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 425 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1057); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (405); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (366); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6479); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (430); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (372); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (262); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1467 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5058); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 328 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (978); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (845); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (335); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1751 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5403); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 404 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (860); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 311 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (907); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (544); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (401); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1394: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1589 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4417); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (632); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (467); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 759 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2357); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 740 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1394: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1508 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4624); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 605 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1695); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (485); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (363); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1394: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6381); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 351 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (942); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (393); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1394: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1689 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5065); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (712); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (475); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3902); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 507 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1461); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 421 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (252); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (342); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1895 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5365); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (398); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1022); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1815 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5462); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (537); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (448); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 766 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2965); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 291 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1008); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (312); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1394: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6703); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (550); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5809); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 305 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (915); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1394: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 987 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3891); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1394: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2433 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (348); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (307); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1394: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 509 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (635); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1492 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (613); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1794 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5287); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (576); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (307); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1394: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1334 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4354); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (460); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1952: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1242 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4380); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 391 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1394: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1458 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4978); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (429); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (363); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1394: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2008 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6030); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 2117: the IEC's cross-ballot total 304 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (665); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (448); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (511); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (407); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1790: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1531: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 2075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1285: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 2135: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 2115: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 1916: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 41: party 28: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: the IEC's published turnout for this municipality is 40.61%; its own counts give 43.71% (PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in its voting districts); we show the calculated figure.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 20:35 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it