Bushbuckridge

special votes 31 671 · All 280 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 280 voting districts here (143 461 of 293 095). The IEC publishes 49.1%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3695 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10889); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 245 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (750); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (645); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (450); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1916 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5668); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1495 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 253 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (783); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2764 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8335); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 520 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1534); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (463); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (375); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1707 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (650); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (664); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2144: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2409 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 314 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (924); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 277 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (819); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (494); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6769); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (608); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (502); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (459); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (220); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1875 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5612); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 820 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2420); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (522); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (483); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (376); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2144: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1810 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5460); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 400 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 312 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (869); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 285 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (752); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (424); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (279); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1570 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4774); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 420 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 276 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (786); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (765); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2969 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8877); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (609); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (484); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (469); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1794 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5416); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (516); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (543); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (481); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (358); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2144: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2077 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 569 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1659); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 273 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (803); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (594); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2144: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1901 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5904); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 496 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1738); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 378 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (555); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (627); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (322); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2144: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1468 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4460); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 558 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1667); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 314 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (918); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (506); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1523 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4614); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 898 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2670); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 440 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (763); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (402); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (342); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (294); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1398 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 546 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1595); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 406 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 298 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (868); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (476); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (285); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1856 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5568); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 336 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (962); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 293 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (852); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 285 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (883); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (680); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (599); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2144: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1503 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4550); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 468 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1341); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 316 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (931); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (414); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (328); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (342); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2144: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2029 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5896); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 802 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2285); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (548); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (537); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (411); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (477); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2541 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7607); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (516); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3865 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11658); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (658); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (335); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2463 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7286); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 300 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (920); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 217 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (655); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 215 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (601); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2265 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6861); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 504 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1479); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (540); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (460); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (368); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2500 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7561); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 465 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1390); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (461); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2144: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6379); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 665 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1871); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (559); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (548); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (308); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (265); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2144: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2393 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 383 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1061); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2144: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2525 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7511); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (489); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2144: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1634 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4885); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 631 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1861); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 273 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (791); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2517 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7626); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 265 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (756); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (764); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (781); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6563); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1268 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3701); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 345 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1016); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (704); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (509); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2144: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2655 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7956); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 746 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 267 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (803); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (500); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1565 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4697); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1376 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4092); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (771); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (491); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (458); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2867 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8539); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 579 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1744); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (435); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (465); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6424); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 604 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1736); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 554 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1582); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 262 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (767); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (299); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2780 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8435); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 960 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2779); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (775); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2144: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2072 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6309); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 860 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2509); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 403 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (589); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2068 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6415); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (665); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (443); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (415); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (431); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2342 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7064); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 830 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2440); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 447 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1313); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (591); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 2144: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2733 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 590 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1716); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (772); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1995 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6034); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 851 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2455); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (466); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (405); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 16:20 SAST.