Chief Albert Luthuli

special votes 7 022 · All 128 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 128 voting districts here (52 555 of 104 263). The IEC publishes 50.7%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3858); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 376 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1017 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2873); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 323 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1036); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 319 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (982); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (460); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (327); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (332); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3702); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 401 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (625); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 837 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2501); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 360 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 294 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (850); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (689); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 857 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2546); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 312 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (933); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 735 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 663 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1954); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 279 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (835); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3450); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 612 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1842); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 292 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (845); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (487); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 876 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2628); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 416 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1256); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1015 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2899); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 390 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 328 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1015); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3575); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 232 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (662); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (670); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (669); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (431); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (396); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 962 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2909); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 343 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1023); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (673); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3537); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 782 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2267); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (256); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1008 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 762 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (256); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3393); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 344 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (957); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (624); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (386); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (442); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (395); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (374); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1038 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 859 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2430); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (625); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (572); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (495); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3283); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 685 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2047); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (299); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (233); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3517); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (537); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (410); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (413); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (269); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3383); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 659 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1908); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 237 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (681); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1184 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3621); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 415 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (720); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 942 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2822); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 580 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1686); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (626); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3531); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 459 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1355); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (528); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (355); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (263); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1070 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3285); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 568 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1644); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 276 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (828); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (414); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (293); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3584); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 337 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (987); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (537); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3376); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 352 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (989); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (508); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (401); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1058 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 275 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (855); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 23:01 SAST.