WardsANC 6darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2000 Ward 5 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

ANC 6 of 12 seats · 7 for a majority

Most ward votes: ANC 42.3%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

DipalesengAll 33 voting districts in

All 6 wards complete

Turnout55.5%

Voters on the roll22 896

South Africa · Counting23 017 of 23 696 voting districts in (97.1%)

checked 00:24Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 12 410 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress5 24642.3%
SDPService Delivery Party1 55512.5%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party1 34310.8%
DADemocratic Alliance1 1969.6%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus8526.9%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters7626.1%
ActionSA6725.4%
SACPSouth African Communist Party2822.3%
SCMSocialist Civic Movement1641.3%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement1641.3%
PAPatriotic Alliance580.5%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party470.4%
LABOURLabour Party of South Africa400.3%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement290.2%

Council seats · 12 ?

African National Congress6 ward · 0 PR6
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1
Democratic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1
Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
ActionSA0 ward · 1 PR1
Umkhonto Wesizwe Party0 ward · 1 PR1
Service Delivery Party0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Dipaleseng ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2000 Ward 5, Dipaleseng in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 6

On EskomSePush

DipalesengPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 2 703 · All 33 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 33 voting districts here (12 704 of 22 896). The IEC publishes 55.5%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 687 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2072); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 518 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1483); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (717); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (560); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (435); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (260); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 881 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2652); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 453 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 289 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (863); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (760); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (585); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (451); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 548 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1628); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 543 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1557); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (811); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 212 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (639); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (380); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (370); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (756); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 207 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (659); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (570); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (553); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 807 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2388); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 232 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (697); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (701); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (701); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3549); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 297 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (918); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (335); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:31 SAST.