Dr JS Moroka

special votes 6 691 · All 121 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 121 voting districts here (64 730 of 133 714). The IEC publishes 49.0%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 861 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2588); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 265 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (801); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1643: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (343); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (350); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2202: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1026 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3009); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (823); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 224 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (691); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (447); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (242); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1643: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 593 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1914); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1643: the IEC's cross-ballot total 584 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (926); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 268 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (924); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (763); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1510: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 915 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2744); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (555); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (448); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (439); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1643: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (386); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2202: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1510: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1039 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2916); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (516); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (396); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (375); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1643: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1510: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1343 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3953); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 359 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (633); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (527); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (364); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1643: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 848 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2620); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 345 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1056); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 295 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (865); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (464); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1643: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 720 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 348 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (948); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (377); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (510); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1510: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1388 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4068); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 265 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (756); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (829); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (817); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (419); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (413); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1643: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2202: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1510: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 967 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2428); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (541); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (462); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (267); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1643: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1510: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 830 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2473); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 669 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1717); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (278); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 494 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1654); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (472); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (292); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1643: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2202: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1510: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 787 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2393); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 707 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2036); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (755); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (576); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1643: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2202: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1510: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 675 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1510); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (472); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (242); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1643: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2202: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1510: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1365 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 298 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (862); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 262 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (753); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (771); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (242); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1643: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 680 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1964); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 323 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (903); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (756); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (592); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (526); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 918 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2809); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 465 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 372 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (619); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (569); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 798 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2369); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 548 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1656); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 326 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (952); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (425); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (348); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1643: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2202: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1389 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 302 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (905); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (602); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (471); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (493); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (522); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1643: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2202: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3446); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (718); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (369); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3427); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 346 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1010); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 237 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (722); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1510: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1320 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3948); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 358 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (327); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (362); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2202: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1510: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 739 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 292 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (917); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (698); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (365); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1510: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 644 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1973); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 238 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (656); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (516); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (323); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1510: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2202: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1050 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 566 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1657); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (543); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (614); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (612); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2202: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (262); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1510: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 596 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1745); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 440 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1401); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (404); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (402); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1643: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1682 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4991); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (694); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (365); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1510: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2202: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 870 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2626); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 590 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1689); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (569); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (393); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1510: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1643: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2202: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 892 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2644); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 603 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1818); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (445); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (396); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2202: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1643: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1026 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3053); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 779 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2335); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (838); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1510: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1754: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2202: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1290 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3820); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 349 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (866); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 236 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (705); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (682); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1510: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1643: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2119: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 07 Nov 2026, 07:28 SAST.