Dr Pixley Ka Isaka Seme

special votes 3 017 · All 44 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 44 voting districts here (23 704 of 44 479). The IEC publishes 53.5%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1431 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1375 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (397); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (405); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 836 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2367); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 663 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2055); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3567); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 774 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2399); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (322); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 719 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 607 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1761); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 491 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1551); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 310 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (972); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 941 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2799); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 571 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1733); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 404 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (784); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 970 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2874); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 854 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2547); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (318); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 834 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2411); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 438 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 401 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 368 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1078); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (402); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 683 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2074); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 656 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1966); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (508); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 879 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2608); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 290 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (881); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (428); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 725 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 437 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1343); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (567); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (412); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (369); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 777 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2323); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 453 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1353); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (337); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:31 SAST.