Emalahleni

special votes 7 389 · All 124 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 124 voting districts here (113 631 of 219 649). The IEC publishes 52.2%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1097 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 317 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (931); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 283 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (867); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (845); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (464); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (304); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 939 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2957); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 406 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 343 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1048); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (669); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 207 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (585); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (486); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (392); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 839 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2380); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 779 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 370 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1092); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 345 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1090); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 860 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2947); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 412 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1363); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 245 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (753); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (713); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (548); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (460); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1315 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3664); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 372 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 337 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1064); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (807); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (582); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 881 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2585); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 315 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (959); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (683); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (644); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (420); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1354 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3861); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 362 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 333 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1018); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 264 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (896); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (708); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (640); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1462 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4355); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (804); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (693); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (569); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1088 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3381); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 722 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1846); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 458 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 329 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1047); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (671); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 569 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1642); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 523 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1631); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 338 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1041); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 304 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (950); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 749 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2358); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 501 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1477); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 383 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 334 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (990); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (682); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (408); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1348 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4004); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 515 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1533); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 440 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1099); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (852); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (398); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1004 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2987); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 902 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2665); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 319 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1001); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (775); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (426); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 786 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2381); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 605 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1822); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 379 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (535); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 891 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2707); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 778 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2318); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 356 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1080); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 221 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (689); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (412); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1070 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 914 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2666); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 407 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (777); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (577); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (499); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1035 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3003); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 465 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 372 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 238 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (796); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (414); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (305); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2092 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 508 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1090); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 381 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1811); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (470); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (514); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (598); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (321); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 770 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2368); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 570 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1887); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 506 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1685); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 236 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (806); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (535); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (366); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2278 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 837 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2511); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 309 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 234 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (840); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (576); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (577); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 942 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2828); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 608 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1827); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 409 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 393 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 288 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (946); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 545 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1499); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 365 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1044); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 237 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (730); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (563); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (362); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (313); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1324 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4016); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 777 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2092); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 725 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 404 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 291 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (908); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (625); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2325 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6942); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 734 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2050); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 430 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 274 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (921); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (639); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (448); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1898 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5762); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1426 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4085); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1392 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4043); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 466 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1386); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1446 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 678 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2052); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 523 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1662); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (744); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (624); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 779 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2308); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 650 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1903); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 241 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (739); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (732); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2071 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6094); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 428 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1446); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 215 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (632); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (639); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (426); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (354); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 883 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2621); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (569); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (327); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1700 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1296 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3747); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 331 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1010); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 311 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (963); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 284 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (596); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (371); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (540); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (337); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2312 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6811); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 556 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1756); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 540 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1548); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 334 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1008); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 292 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (867); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1037 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 726 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 441 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1401); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2368 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6795); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 570 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1777); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 372 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (745); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (553); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (500); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2771 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 869 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2599); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 184 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (611); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (467); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (331); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1039 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 952 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 632 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1930); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (571); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1283 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3958); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 628 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1864); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 434 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 392 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 287 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (785); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (328); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 19:19 SAST.