No majority

ANC 23 of 71 seats · 36 for a majority

Most ward votes: ANC 31.5%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

EmalahleniAll 124 voting districts in

All 36 wards complete

Turnout51.7%

Voters on the roll220k

South Africa · Counting23 153 of 23 696 voting districts in (97.7%)

checked 02:32Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 111 208 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress35 06031.5%
DADemocratic Alliance26 43123.8%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party15 57414.0%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters11 74310.6%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus5 6395.1%
SDPService Delivery Party5 4554.9%
ActionSA4 5254.1%
SACPSouth African Communist Party1 2131.1%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party8640.8%
IndependentIndependent candidates7200.6%
AICAfrican Independent Congress6200.6%
LABOURLabour Party of South Africa5960.5%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement5910.5%
PAPatriotic Alliance3530.3%
UATUnited Africans Transformation2860.3%
AEMAfrican Economic Movement2790.3%
APCAfrican People's Convention2780.2%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement2170.2%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party1930.2%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania1540.1%
SADASocialist Agenda of Dispossessed Africans1280.1%
BPSABolsheviks Party of South Africa1000.1%
OHMOrganic Humanity Movement590.1%
DOPDefenders of the People500.0%
SPPSindawonye Progressive Party280.0%
Elf-SA - Economic Liberators Forum South AfricaElf-SA - Economic Liberators Forum South Africa250.0%
FISAFreedom in South Africa150.0%
ACPAll Citizens Party120.0%

Council seats · 71 ?

African National Congress23 ward · 0 PR23
Democratic Alliance10 ward · 7 PR17
Umkhonto Wesizwe Party1 ward · 9 PR10
Economic Freedom Fighters2 ward · 6 PR8
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 4 PR4
Service Delivery Party0 ward · 4 PR4
ActionSA0 ward · 3 PR3
Inkatha Freedom Party0 ward · 1 PR1
South African Communist Party0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Emalahleni ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power412hours off38 outages

Water32hours off2 outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2016 Ward 12, Emalahleni in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

On EskomSePush

EmalahleniPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 7 389 · All 124 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 124 voting districts here (113 631 of 219 649). The IEC publishes 52.2%.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 939 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2957); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 406 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 343 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1048); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (669); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 207 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (585); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (486); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (392); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 839 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2380); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 779 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 370 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1092); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 345 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1090); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1315 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3664); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 372 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 337 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1064); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (807); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (582); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1354 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3861); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 362 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 333 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1018); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 264 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (896); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (708); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (640); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1462 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4355); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (804); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (693); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (569); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 569 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1642); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 523 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1631); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 338 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1041); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 304 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (950); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 749 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2358); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 501 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1477); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 383 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 334 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (990); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (682); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (408); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1004 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2987); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 902 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2665); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 319 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1001); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (775); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (426); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 786 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2381); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 605 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1822); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 379 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (535); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1035 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3003); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 465 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 372 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 238 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (796); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (414); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (305); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 770 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2368); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 570 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1887); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 506 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1685); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 236 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (806); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (535); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (366); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2278 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 837 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2511); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 309 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 234 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (840); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (576); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (577); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 942 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2828); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 608 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1827); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 409 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 393 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 288 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (946); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1324 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4016); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 777 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2092); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 725 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 404 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 291 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (908); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (625); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2325 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6942); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 734 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2050); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 430 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 274 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (921); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (639); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (448); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 779 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2308); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 650 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1903); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 241 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (739); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (732); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 883 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2621); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (569); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (327); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1700 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1296 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3747); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 331 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1010); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 311 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (963); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 284 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (596); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (371); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (540); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (337); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1037 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 726 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 441 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1401); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1283 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3958); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 628 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1864); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 434 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 392 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 287 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (785); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (328); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1104: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 19:19 SAST.

Emalahleni

Ward ballot ? · 111 208 valid votes

Council seats · 71 ?

Hours off in Emalahleni ?

2016 Ward 12, Emalahleni in 2026 ?

Wards · 36

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Get the ESP App