Govan Mbeki

special votes 5 543 · 100 of 104 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 100 voting districts with results so far here (74 688 of 148 769). The IEC publishes 49.1%.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 724 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2085); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 654 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1954); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (602); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (540); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 963 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2889); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 331 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (992); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 317 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (941); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 316 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (977); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 605 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1849); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 348 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (991); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 278 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (839); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 227 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (705); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (772); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (821); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 212 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (658); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (372); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1975 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5739); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 439 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1365); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (306); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (450); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 698 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 467 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 354 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1066); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 247 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (728); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 574 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1672); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 330 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1038); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 307 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (916); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 303 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (807); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (457); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 623 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1955); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 275 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (800); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (775); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (466); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 582 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2242); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 250 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1050); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 239 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (942); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (970); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (407); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 718 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 371 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1076); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 341 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1001); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (762); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (771); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (473); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 555 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1690); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 480 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1485); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 416 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1264); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 338 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (982); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (429); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 492 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1693); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (490); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (379); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (362); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (364); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (345); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 717 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 403 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 338 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (983); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (550); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (414); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 501 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1477); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 440 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1303); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (557); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (484); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 607 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1812); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 497 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1438); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 264 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (856); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (362); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (316); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1489 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4269); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 551 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1659); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 503 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1513); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (557); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (419); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 533 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1544); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 318 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (962); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (424); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (369); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1558 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4544); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 575 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1771); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 346 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1030); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 287 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (847); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (667); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 583 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1720); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (774); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 241 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (760); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (654); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 710 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 548 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1639); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 317 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (942); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (554); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2293 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6746); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 576 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1728); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (593); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 764 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 484 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1454); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 227 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (701); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (509); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (442); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 887 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2685); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 776 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2347); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 507 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1593); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 439 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (597); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 694 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 649 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2022); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 475 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1437); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 303 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (854); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (265); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3577); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 436 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 284 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (858); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (309); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 773 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2368); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 594 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1784); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 496 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1495); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 224 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (696); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (220); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 464 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1478); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 330 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 298 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1038); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (342); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1408 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4041); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 661 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 331 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1022); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 184 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (597); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (326); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 622 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1871); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 515 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1505); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 344 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1001); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 339 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1060); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (513); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2666 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7683); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 817 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2461); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (415); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 764 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 267 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (831); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (648); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (541); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (405); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 665 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2009); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 527 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1531); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 426 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1279); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 365 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1070); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 214 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (632); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1080: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1644: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1951 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5721); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 584 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1712); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2005: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 20:04 SAST.