Lekwa

special votes 3 066 · All 43 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 43 voting districts here (30 058 of 56 731). The IEC publishes 53.3%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 910 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2638); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 298 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (931); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (528); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (390); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (441); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 708 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1806); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 427 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1306); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (670); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (388); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 393 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1052); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 357 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 291 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (883); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (611); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (564); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (348); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 741 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1896); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 299 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (968); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (936); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (669); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (531); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (406); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 592 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1788); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 525 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1549); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 340 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1070); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (653); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (406); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (340); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 336 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1064); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 293 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (932); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (608); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (513); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (509); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (343); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 293 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (965); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 265 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (848); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (584); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (596); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (321); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 708 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1926); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 377 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 285 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (965); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 214 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (661); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (333); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 710 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (583); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (513); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (509); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (462); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (332); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (296); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 946 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2701); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 489 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1475); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 395 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1260); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (520); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (399); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (465); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (417); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 628 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1785); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 622 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1963); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 267 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (832); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (672); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (450); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 817 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2396); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 463 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1358); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (503); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (479); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (493); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (303); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 488 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1485); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 267 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (766); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (410); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (263); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 701 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2039); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 440 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1331); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 324 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (993); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (292); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (742); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 16:36 SAST.