Mkhondo

special votes 5 139 · All 82 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 82 voting districts here (44 010 of 80 080). The IEC publishes 55.2%.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1047 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 614 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1817); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 991 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2957); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 743 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 742 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2308); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (576); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 430 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 423 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 936 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2853); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 784 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2328); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (288); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 954 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2904); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 665 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1987); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1262 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3675); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 685 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2061); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (532); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (473); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 987 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3006); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 972 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2861); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (505); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1309 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3936); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3322); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (568); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (497); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 759 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 583 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1744); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (597); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (488); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (474); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 974 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3316); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 565 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1750); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (491); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (492); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (350); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (294); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 775 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2349); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 465 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1403); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (492); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 891 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2681); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 496 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1443); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 283 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (837); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (307); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (332); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1096 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3423); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 788 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2372); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 273 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (687); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (810); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (445); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1262 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3761); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 927 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2891); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (498); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 887 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2669); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 552 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1657); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3430); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 767 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (367); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (402); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (295); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1052 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 885 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2673); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1082 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 580 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1782); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 237 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (678); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (395); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (295); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 11:07 SAST.