Msukaligwa

special votes 5 315 · All 77 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 77 voting districts here (41 354 of 77 037). The IEC publishes 53.7%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 676 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1983); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 517 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1499); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (790); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (637); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 643 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1945); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 609 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1834); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 237 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (768); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (517); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (260); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1026 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3090); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 943 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2787); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 502 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1501); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 360 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1069); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (313); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 507 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1574); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 457 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (525); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (453); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (374); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 466 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 434 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1267); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 385 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 260 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (806); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (376); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 500 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1448); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 474 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1452); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (621); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (369); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 729 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 317 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (973); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (468); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (287); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 902 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2479); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 729 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2084); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 349 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (977); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 331 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (897); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (501); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (420); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (327); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 865 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2716); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 852 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2496); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 275 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (826); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (611); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (458); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (278); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1319 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4026); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 641 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1739); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 748 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 704 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1319 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3962); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (681); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (367); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (283); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 606 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1826); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 405 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 330 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (980); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (349); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 702 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2087); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 401 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 335 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (977); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (468); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (380); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1608 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4831); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 348 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1041); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (535); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 849 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 803 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2377); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (745); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (269); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 576 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1668); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 435 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1321); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (699); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (580); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (439); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (435); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 798 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 709 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (431); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (385); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1008 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3066); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 565 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1655); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (394); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1724: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:31 SAST.