Nkomazi

Get the app
Ward 1: ANC 53.4%Ward 3: EFF 50.1%Ward 4: ANC 56.4%Ward 6: ANC 57.4%Ward 7: ANC 55.9%Ward 8: ANC 58.6%Ward 11: EFF 63.1%Ward 12: ANC 64.8%Ward 13: ANC 62.9%Ward 14: ANC 56.2%Ward 15: MKP 51.6%Ward 16: ANC 52.5%Ward 17: ANC 71.0%Ward 18: ANC 65.7%Ward 19: ANC 65.4%Ward 20: ANC 55.8%Ward 21: ANC 48.5%Ward 22: ANC 45.3%Ward 23: ANC 52.8%Ward 24: ANC 56.1%Ward 25: ANC 50.1%Ward 26: ANC 57.2%Ward 27: ANC 51.7%Ward 28: ANC 55.9%Ward 29: ANC 69.9%Ward 30: ANC 43.2%Ward 31: ANC 41.3%Ward 32: ANC 62.4%Ward 33: ANC 62.6%Ward 34: ANC 58.5%Ward 35: DA 40.0%Ward 2: ANC 74.1%Ward 5: ANC 58.9%Ward 9: ANC 56.7%Ward 10: ANC 48.5%
WardsANC 31EFF 2MKP 1DA 1darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2011 Ward 2 (2011 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

ANC majority

37 of 69 seats

Most ward votes: ANC 54.4%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

NkomaziAll 179 voting districts in
All 35 wards complete
Turnout54.3%
Voters on the roll203k
South Africa · Counting23 619 of 23 696 voting districts in (99.7%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 108 725 valid votes

Council seats · 69 ?

Hours off in Nkomazi ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power390hours off40 outages
Water121hours off10 outages
Internet15hours off1 outage
May · Power: 56 hours offMay · Water: 26 hours offMay: 82 hours off82MayJun · Power: 59 hours offJun · Water: 11 hours offJun: 70 hours off70JunJul · Power: 25 hours offJul · Water: 37 hours offJul: 62 hours off62JulAug · Power: 71 hours offAug · Water: 6 hours offAug: 77 hours off77AugSep · Power: 38 hours offSep · Internet: 15 hours offSep: 53 hours off53SepOct · Power: 140 hours offOct · Water: 41 hours offOct: 181 hours off181Oct

2011 Ward 2, Nkomazi in 2026 ?

Wards · 35

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 17 543 · All 179 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 179 voting districts here (109 967 of 202 556). The IEC publishes 54.8%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1371 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4082); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1012 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3008); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2399 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7066); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 534 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1787); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (429); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1548 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4527); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3529); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (365); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (293); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1724 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1036 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1854 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5538); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 931 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2852); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6348); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 460 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1375); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 404 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 285 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (820); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (513); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1327 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3977); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 738 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (404); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1811 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5405); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 976 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2917); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (529); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2285 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6603); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1049 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3337); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (434); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (347); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (334); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1809 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1456 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4431); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (279); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2268 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6700); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3657); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2540 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7638); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 952 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2888); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 212 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (645); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1875 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5637); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 721 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (477); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1972 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5919); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 813 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2396); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 469 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1535); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2091 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1631 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4986); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (685); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1613 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 776 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2334); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 425 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (263); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6378); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 440 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1443); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1773 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5294); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 721 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1844 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5518); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 373 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1056); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 365 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (233); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1783 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 696 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 403 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (381); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1735 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1096 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3331); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 287 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (857); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (686); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1044 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 769 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2370); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (508); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (491); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1647 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5006); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3566); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (331); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1976 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5792); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1318 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3989); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1627 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4829); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1082 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 373 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1089); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1540 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4619); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 977 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2970); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1661 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4974); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 988 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2981); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (526); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (385); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (318); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1492 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4408); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 823 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2535); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (543); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2072 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6077); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 651 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2040); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (305); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3464); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 900 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2589); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (608); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (560); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (371); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1080 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 894 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2710); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 453 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1331); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1562 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4646); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 387 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1091); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 367 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1481 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 567 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1791); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (279); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1576 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4488); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 752 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2441); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1459 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4395); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1306 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3776); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 570 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1641); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (604); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 07 Nov 2026, 07:23 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it