Steve Tshwete

special votes 75 · 27 of 71 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 27 voting districts with results so far here (20 898 of 40 021). The IEC publishes 45.3%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (625); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (265); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 596 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1752); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 292 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (937); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (517); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (485); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 485 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (998); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (341); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 273 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (804); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (853); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (309); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (386); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (264); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 535 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1614); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (625); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (625); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 892 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2682); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (609); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1701 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4975); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 360 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 703 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 675 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2014); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (771); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (727); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (267); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 527 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1576); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 482 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1513); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (749); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 215 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (631); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (518); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (323); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (318); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 346 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (691); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 184 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (357); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (311); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (276); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (604); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (302); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (460); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (415); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 342 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (970); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (437); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 420 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (513); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 648 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1990); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (718); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (631); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (476); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 857 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2515); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 423 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1327); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (437); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: the IEC's published turnout for this municipality is 45.27%; its own counts give 52.22% (PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in its voting districts); we show the calculated figure.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 12:19 SAST.