Steve Tshwete

special votes 486 · All 71 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 71 voting districts here (65 345 of 122 264). The IEC publishes 53.9%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 722 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 401 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 346 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1031); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (500); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (469); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 829 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2545); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 435 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1293); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (784); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (531); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (345); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 918 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2706); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 409 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 345 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (962); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (665); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (649); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 184 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (604); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (496); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 627 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1937); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 550 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1634); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 401 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (509); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 596 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1752); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 292 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (937); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (517); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (485); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1004 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 430 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 415 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (451); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (403); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (472); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 610 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1874); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 322 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (954); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (659); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (333); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (387); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 939 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2712); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 505 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1552); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (580); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (491); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (471); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (313); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 618 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1907); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (775); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (632); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (312); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 659 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1955); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 401 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1250); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 360 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1039); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 351 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (960); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (462); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 837 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2430); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 273 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (898); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (573); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (578); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (423); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (337); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2802 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7974); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 428 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1327); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 296 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (994); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (366); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2074 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 554 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1651); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (634); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (348); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6328); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 217 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (675); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1701 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4975); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 360 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6561); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 641 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2028); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 966 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2908); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 966 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2596); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 318 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (943); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 296 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (919); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (323); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 527 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1576); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 482 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1513); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (749); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 215 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (631); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (518); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (323); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (318); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 458 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1358); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (766); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (571); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (285); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (326); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (263); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 621 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1850); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 326 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (884); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (683); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (578); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (434); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (333); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (307); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 647 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1851); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 277 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (877); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (588); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (439); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (331); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (317); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 501 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1466); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (583); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (611); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (492); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (428); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 756 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 454 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1388); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 362 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (913); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 335 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (914); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (640); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (605); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 186 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (580); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 630 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1888); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 338 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1064); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (597); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (519); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (414); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 547 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1584); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 287 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (847); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (571); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (431); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 747 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 350 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1050); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (621); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (543); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 889 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2669); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 253 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (750); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (430); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (378); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 673 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2065); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 353 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1092); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (644); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (485); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 892 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 331 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (973); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (451); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (469); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (278); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (378); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2099: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1558: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1918: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 07 Nov 2026, 17:16 SAST.