ANC 47.3%
Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)
- ANC 47.3%
- EFF 22.4%
- DA 15.4%
- Others 14.9%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 1 811 valid votes
ANCAfrican National Congress85747.3%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters40622.4%
DADemocratic Alliance27815.4%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1025.6%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party633.5%- SDPService Delivery Party331.8%
ActionSA211.2%- SACPSouth African Communist Party191.0%
- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement150.8%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement70.4%
APCAfrican People's Convention30.2%
AUMAfrican Unified Movement30.2%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party20.1%
PAPatriotic Alliance20.1%
ESP app
How long is the queue?
Chat about the election in your area
ESP app
How did Thaba Chweu vote?
Get notified when it's declared
Hours off in Thaba Chweu ?
Reported in the ESP app
Wards · 14
- Ward 11 of 2 voting districts inANC 64.8%
- Ward 21 of 3 voting districts inANC 58.8%
- Ward 41 of 3 voting districts inEFF 39.1%
- Ward 51 of 4 voting districts inANC 39.3%
- Ward 111 of 8 voting districts inANC 50.0%
- Ward 132 of 6 voting districts inANC 35.0%
- Ward 3Not in yet
- Ward 6Not in yet
- Ward 7Not in yet
- Ward 8Not in yet
- Ward 9Not in yet
- Ward 10Not in yet
- Ward 12Not in yet
- Ward 14Not in yet
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 180 · 7 of 47 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 7 voting districts with results so far here (1 822 of 3 594). The IEC publishes 50.8%.
The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 352 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1041); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (533); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (535); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (332); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 02:03 SAST.