Thaba Chweu

special votes 4 726 · All 47 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 47 voting districts here (27 996 of 57 627). The IEC publishes 48.7%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 668 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1973); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (390); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (392); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3498); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 461 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1351); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (731); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (513); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (265); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 877 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2672); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 304 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (918); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 224 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (716); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (458); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 613 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1868); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 580 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1696); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (414); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1065 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 647 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1947); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (780); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (404); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 364 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1054); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 227 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (662); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 212 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (653); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (448); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (242); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 752 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 667 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1953); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 511 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1546); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (680); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1004 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3055); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 311 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (891); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (627); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (577); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (509); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1274 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3859); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 502 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1537); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 358 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1069); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (529); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 757 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2287); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 374 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 350 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1035); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (473); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (265); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1995: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 360 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1097); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (657); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (459); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1671 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4948); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 545 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1651); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (743); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (278); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1089 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3311); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 306 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (876); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 238 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (706); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (471); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (302); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 856 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2490); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 227 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (687); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (596); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1515: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1553: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:40 SAST.