Victor Khanye

special votes 5 111 · All 30 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 30 voting districts here (25 104 of 41 002). The IEC publishes 61.7%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 874 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2598); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 736 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 367 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 997 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3074); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 798 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 284 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (862); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1577 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4706); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3568); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 522 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1602); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (427); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (334); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1900: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 974 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2902); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 609 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1910); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 432 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1305); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 932: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1911: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1677 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5019); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 737 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2337); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 409 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (278); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 923 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2732); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 828 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2475); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 316 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (967); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (484); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2008: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1090 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 637 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1976); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 458 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 248 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (740); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 760 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2316); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 668 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1813); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 371 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 366 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1464 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 670 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2049); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 546 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1641); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 276 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (812); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:31 SAST.