ANC 33.9%
Leading on the DC 40% ballot so far (provisional)
- ANC 33.9%
- DA 27.3%
- EFF 9.0%
- Others 29.8%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
DC 40% ballot ? · 2 716 valid votes
ANCAfrican National Congress92133.9%
DADemocratic Alliance74227.3%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters2449.0%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus2268.3%- SEDIMOSave Ditsobotla Movement903.3%
ActionSA893.3%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party843.1%
PAPatriotic Alliance552.0%- SACPSouth African Communist Party481.8%
- KOPANOKopano Movement451.7%
- Bophuthatswana Civil MovementBophuthatswana Civil Movement431.6%
- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement210.8%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party180.7%
UCDPUnited Christian Democratic Party150.6%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement130.5%
AICAfrican Independent Congress120.4%
UATUnited Africans Transformation110.4%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania70.3%- ARCAfrican Revolutionary Council70.3%
APCAfrican People's Convention60.2%- ASMAfrican Spear Movement60.2%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party50.2%
ACPAll Citizens Party40.1%- SDPService Delivery Party20.1%
- AANDCAll and Citizens20.1%
ESP app
How long is the queue?
Chat about the election in your area
ESP app
How did Ditsobotla vote?
Get notified when it's declared
Hours off in Ditsobotla ?
Reported in the ESP app
Wards · 20
- Ward 21 of 3 voting districts inANC 50.8%
- Ward 32 of 5 voting districts inDA 44.3%
- Ward 51 of 7 voting districts inANC 58.3%
- Ward 72 of 5 voting districts inDA 77.2%
- Ward 101 of 5 voting districts inANC 26.7%
- Ward 111 of 6 voting districts inANC 38.5%
- Ward 151 of 5 voting districts inANC 55.6%
- Ward 163 of 6 voting districts inANC 36.8%
- Ward 174 of 11 voting districts inANC 56.7%
- Ward 191 of 6 voting districts inEFF 35.3%
- Ward 1Not in yet
- Ward 4Not in yet
- Ward 6Not in yet
- Ward 8Not in yet
- Ward 9Not in yet
- Ward 12Not in yet
- Ward 13Not in yet
- Ward 14Not in yet
- Ward 18Not in yet
- Ward 20Not in yet
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 199 · 17 of 97 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 17 voting districts with results so far here (2 846 of 6 016). The IEC publishes 47.4%.
The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.
Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (476); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 450 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1344); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (412); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 379 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1117); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 11:50 SAST.