Ditsobotla

special votes 2 543 · 32 of 97 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 32 voting districts with results so far here (9 502 of 18 567). The IEC publishes 52.0%.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 340 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1014); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (521); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (422); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (326); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (299); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 327 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1009); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (572); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (424); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (397); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (376); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (264); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 723 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (461); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (348); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 450 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (363); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (337); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (262); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (412); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 632 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1681); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (565); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (448); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (305); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 428 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (440); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (262); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 679 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2032); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 415 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (861); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (719); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (388); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 538 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1579); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (333); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (949); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 513 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1024); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 250 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (499); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 18:20 SAST.