ANC 39.0%
Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)
- ANC 39.0%
- DA 15.9%
- PA 8.9%
- Others 36.2%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 5 682 valid votes
ANCAfrican National Congress2 21839.0%
DADemocratic Alliance90315.9%
PAPatriotic Alliance5038.9%- SEDIMOSave Ditsobotla Movement4678.2%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters4437.8%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus3105.5%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party1492.6%
ActionSA1392.4%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement1262.2%- SACPSouth African Communist Party891.6%
- KOPANOKopano Movement601.1%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party541.0%- Bophuthatswana Civil MovementBophuthatswana Civil Movement430.8%
- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement420.7%
APCAfrican People's Convention260.5%
AHCAfrican Heart Congress250.4%
UCDPUnited Christian Democratic Party180.3%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania140.2%- ASMAfrican Spear Movement130.2%
- ARCAfrican Revolutionary Council130.2%
- NFNew Force80.1%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party40.1%- FISAFreedom in South Africa40.1%
- LABOURLabour Party of South Africa40.1%
- SDPService Delivery Party30.1%
UATUnited Africans Transformation20.0%
ACPAll Citizens Party20.0%
ESP app
How long is the queue?
Chat about the election in your area
ESP app
How did Ditsobotla vote?
Get notified when it's declared
Hours off in Ditsobotla ?
Reported in the ESP app
2021 Ward 12, Ditsobotla in 2026 ?
No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.
Wards · 20
- Ward 21 of 3 voting districts inANC 50.8%
- Ward 33 of 5 voting districts inDA 42.0%
- Ward 52 of 7 voting districts inANC 54.1%
- Ward 72 of 5 voting districts inDA 77.2%
- Ward 102 of 5 voting districts inATM 20.0%
- Ward 111 of 6 voting districts inANC 38.5%
- Ward 151 of 5 voting districts inANC 55.6%
- Ward 164 of 6 voting districts inANC 41.2%
- Ward 175 of 11 voting districts inANC 52.7%
- Ward 193 of 6 voting districts inANC 54.3%
- Ward 201 of 2 voting districts inANC 53.2%
- Ward 1Not in yet
- Ward 4Not in yet
- Ward 6Not in yet
- Ward 8Not in yet
- Ward 9Not in yet
- Ward 12Not in yet
- Ward 13Not in yet
- Ward 14Not in yet
- Ward 18Not in yet
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 518 · 25 of 97 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 25 voting districts with results so far here (5 937 of 11 599). The IEC publishes 48.6%.
Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (476); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (348); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 450 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1344); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (363); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (337); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (262); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (228); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (412); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 480 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1433); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 409 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (845); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (388); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 415 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1216); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (283); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (247); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (949); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1866: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 513 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1024); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 250 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (499); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: the IEC's published turnout for this municipality is 48.57%; its own counts give 51.19% (PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in its voting districts); we show the calculated figure.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 16:04 SAST.