Ward 5

Get the app
Voting district 86910026: DA 66.1% (PR ballot)Laerskool Ml Fick (VD 86910026)
Voting districtsDA 1darker = bigger win
Dots: voting stations
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

DA 67.1%up 14.2 pts from 52.9% in 2021

Democratic Alliance · won the ward ballot

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

This wardAll 1 voting districts in
Turnout67.7%
Voters on the roll3 592
South Africa · Counting17 474 of 23 696 voting districts in (73.7%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 2 426 valid votes

Hours off in Ward 5 ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power1 012hours off74 outages
Water72hours off5 outages
Internet62hours off6 outages
May · Power: 205 hours offMay: 205 hours off205MayJun · Power: 99 hours offJun · Water: 51 hours offJun: 150 hours off150JunJul · Power: 134 hours offJul · Internet: 28 hours offJul: 162 hours off162JulAug · Power: 224 hours offAug · Internet: 28 hours offAug: 252 hours off252AugSep · Power: 161 hours offSep · Water: 15 hours offSep · Internet: 6 hours offSep: 182 hours off182SepOct · Power: 189 hours offOct · Water: 6 hours offOct: 195 hours off195Oct

Voting districts · 1 ?

Candidates · 14

Source: IEC certified candidate list (PDF, 16 Sept 2026)

This ward in earlier elections ?

Boundaries changed after 2021: each ward's own results, never re-allocated.

ESP areas in this ward · 2 ?

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 2 426 · spoilt 0 · special votes 255 · All 1 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

PR ballot figures for this ward are the sum of the IEC's results for its 1 voting district; the IEC publishes the ward ballot per ward and the PR ballot per voting district.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 1 voting district here (2 432 of 3 592). The IEC publishes 67.7%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same ward (the ward that covered the same area then), both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1628 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4820); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 606 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1879); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910026: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1603 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4820); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910026: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 633 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1879); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910026: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910026: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910026: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910026: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910026: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910026: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910026: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910026: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910026: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910026: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910026: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910026: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910026: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910026: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86910026: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: JB Marks's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 08:05 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it