Kagisano-Molopo

special votes 3 940 · All 91 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 91 voting districts here (26 871 of 61 810). The IEC publishes 43.6%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1273 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3825); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 353 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1001); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (476); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 843 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2527); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 416 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 831 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2495); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 276 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (806); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (322); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 967 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2902); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 265 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (777); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (452); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (220); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1007 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2679); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (591); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (440); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (392); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1308 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3885); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (587); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3551); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 295 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (858); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (623); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 876 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2678); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (771); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 221 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (594); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 917 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2746); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 275 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (814); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1539 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4519); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (572); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (524); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (378); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1215 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3587); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (276); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 725 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (385); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (328); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1809 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5741); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 667 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1651); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (458); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (387); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1067 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 409 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1034 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (456); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 19:18 SAST.