WardsANC 6SACP 1darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2011 Ward 1 (2011 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

ANC 6 of 13 seats · 7 for a majority

Most ward votes: ANC 43.3%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

KgetlengrivierAll 29 voting districts in

All 7 wards complete

Turnout51.4%

Voters on the roll25 075

South Africa · Counting22 535 of 23 696 voting districts in (95.1%)

checked 21:39Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 12 494 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress5 40843.3%
SACPSouth African Communist Party1 98815.9%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1 80514.4%
DADemocratic Alliance1 0198.2%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters7255.8%
ActionSA5394.3%
KPFKgetleng People's Forum3562.8%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party3122.5%
LABOURLabour Party of South Africa1731.4%
ACPAll Citizens Party850.7%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement250.2%
ASMAfrican Spear Movement250.2%
OHMOrganic Humanity Movement170.1%
PAPatriotic Alliance100.1%
PURPLEPurple Party Ikageng40.0%
SLK26Seriti le Kaelo Independent Party30.0%

Council seats · 13 ?

African National Congress6 ward · 0 PR6
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 2 PR2
South African Communist Party1 ward · 1 PR2
Democratic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1
Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
ActionSA0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Kgetlengrivier ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power11hours off1 outage

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2011 Ward 1, Kgetlengrivier in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 7

On EskomSePush

KgetlengrivierPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 2 214 · All 29 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 29 voting districts here (12 890 of 25 075). The IEC publishes 51.5%.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 737 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 637 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1940); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (467); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2078: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 566 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1700); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 447 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1292); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 255 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (701); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (625); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2078: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1817: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 708 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 594 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1741); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 316 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (917); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (598); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2078: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 691 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (360); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2078: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1817: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1072 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (346); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (364); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2078: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1817: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 689 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2056); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 491 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1405); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 301 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (972); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (450); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (372); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2078: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1045 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 658 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1965); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (555); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (407); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (296); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2078: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2002: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1817: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:17 SAST.