WardsEFF 4ANC 2DA 1darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2016 Ward 5 (2016 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

ANC and EFF 5 seats each of 14 · 8 for a majority

Most ward votes: ANC 35.0%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Lekwa-TeemaneAll 23 voting districts in

All 7 wards complete

Turnout56.9%

Voters on the roll29 280

South Africa · Counting23 429 of 23 696 voting districts in (98.9%)

checked 12:28Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 15 991 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress5 59335.0%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters5 27533.0%
DADemocratic Alliance1 3248.3%
ACTAfrican Congress for Transformation1 2888.1%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus9646.0%
ActionSA7724.8%
LTDPLekwa Teemaneng Development Party1851.2%
PAPatriotic Alliance1761.1%
SACPSouth African Communist Party1420.9%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party1400.9%
UATUnited Africans Transformation970.6%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement350.2%

Council seats · 14 ?

African National Congress2 ward · 3 PR5
Economic Freedom Fighters4 ward · 1 PR5
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1
Democratic Alliance1 ward · 0 PR1
ActionSA0 ward · 1 PR1
African Congress for Transformation0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Lekwa-Teemane ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power20hours off2 outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2016 Ward 5, Lekwa-Teemane in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Ward 5All of 2016 ward 5 · 2026: EFF 46.5%

Wards · 7

On EskomSePush

Lekwa-TeemanePower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 2 791 · All 23 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 23 voting districts here (16 668 of 29 280). The IEC publishes 57.0%.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 852 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2597); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (430); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2176: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 898 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2695); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 781 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2375); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (362); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2176: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 941 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2754); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 402 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 328 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (991); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2176: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 783 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2413); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 623 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1802); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 425 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (638); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 195 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (573); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (516); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2176: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3451); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 879 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2687); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 374 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1062); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2176: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 913 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2629); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 497 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1465); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 331 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1040); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 315 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1028); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2176: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 607 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1832); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 433 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (502); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 19:18 SAST.