Mafikeng

special votes 6 408 · All 123 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 123 voting districts here (69 419 of 150 161). The IEC publishes 46.7%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3411); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (549); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 682 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2052); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (778); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (708); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (299); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (307); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 965 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3051); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 379 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (923); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (318); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1023 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3061); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 307 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (862); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (643); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (406); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 789 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2390); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (626); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (520); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (375); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (728); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (528); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (484); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 725 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 357 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1096); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 300 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (898); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (676); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (590); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 796 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2363); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 424 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 334 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (999); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 288 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (904); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1018 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3081); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 510 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1458); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (503); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (437); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 615 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1733); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 496 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1500); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 354 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (610); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 517 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1558); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 396 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (507); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (287); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 749 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 348 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1098); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 333 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1049); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 298 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (943); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (368); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 809 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 411 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1318); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 389 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (752); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (362); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 867 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2693); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 258 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (748); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (526); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (457); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (432); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 915 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2744); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (707); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (531); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 714 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 361 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1067); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (502); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (283); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 710 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 490 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1666); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 195 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (711); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 786 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2481); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 361 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 241 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (782); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (723); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 600 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1789); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 330 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (997); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (574); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (529); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (451); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 641 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1921); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 304 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (785); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 287 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (831); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (459); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 853 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2595); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 419 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (731); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 258 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (781); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (667); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 843 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2479); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 433 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3386); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 446 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1278); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (388); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (378); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (355); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1393 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4003); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 362 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1035); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (308); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (663); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (354); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 976 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2911); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (807); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (316); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 936 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2752); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (783); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 184 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (547); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 716 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 555 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1623); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (680); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (387); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 996 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2960); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 217 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (652); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (507); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (474); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (364); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1214 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3538); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 458 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1435); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (562); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (563); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (551); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (411); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (295); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1031 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 556 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1574); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (789); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (350); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (386); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 923 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2811); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (593); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (407); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1005 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2792); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 305 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (984); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (905); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 207 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (645); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 533 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1832); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 353 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1294); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 330 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1092); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (777); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 743 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (582); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (523); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (395); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (294); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (277); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 716 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (575); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (525); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (399); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (418); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 15:47 SAST.