WardsANC 8darker = bigger win

Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the DC 40% ballot per ward

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

ANC 7 of 16 seats · 9 for a majority

Most DC 40% votes: ANC 45.7% · down 12.9 pts from 58.6% in 2021

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

MamusaAll 25 voting districts in

All 8 wards complete

Turnout50.6%

Voters on the roll33 578

South Africa · Counting22 113 of 23 696 voting districts in (93.3%)

checked 19:48Latest results

DC 40% ballot ? · 15 922 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress7 27545.7%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters2 22013.9%
SACPSouth African Communist Party1 4779.3%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1 2788.0%
ActionSA7874.9%
DADemocratic Alliance6143.9%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement5733.6%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party5663.6%
PAPatriotic Alliance3682.3%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party3672.3%
UATUnited Africans Transformation2111.3%
ACTAfrican Congress for Transformation550.3%
AICMAzanian Independent Community Movement430.3%
RASAReform Alliance of South Africa260.2%
ASMAfrican Spear Movement240.2%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party110.1%
ACTAActive Citizenry Taung Association100.1%
UCDPUnited Christian Democratic Party90.1%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania80.1%

Council seats · 16 ?

African National Congress7 ward · 0 PR7
Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 3 PR3
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1 ward · 0 PR1
Democratic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1
South African Communist Party0 ward · 1 PR1
ActionSA0 ward · 1 PR1
Umkhonto Wesizwe Party0 ward · 1 PR1
Afrika Mayibuye Movement0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Mamusa ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power59hours off6 outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

Wards · 8

On EskomSePush

MamusaPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 3 616 · All 25 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 25 voting districts here (16 983 of 33 578). The IEC publishes 51.0%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 723 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 492 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1611); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 284 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (859); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (627); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (308); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 728 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2233); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 292 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (842); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 258 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (734); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1346 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3976); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 517 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1526); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 203 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (604); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 869 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2659); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (731); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (468); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (304); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (220); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 892 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2656); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 445 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 351 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1047); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (318); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 831 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2474); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 281 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (809); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (545); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 655 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1987); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (812); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (196); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1063 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3220); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 521 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (469); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (358); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 17:01 SAST.