Ward 3

Get the app
Voting district 86960032: EFF 39.5% (PR ballot)Voting district 86960076: ANC 61.4% (PR ballot)Ragogang Primary School (VD 86960032)African Methodist Episcopal Church (VD 86960076)
Voting districtsEFF 1ANC 1darker = bigger win
Dots: voting stations
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too
200020062011201620212026

ANC 46.1%down 18.1 pts from 64.2% in 2021

African National Congress · won the ward ballot

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

This wardAll 2 voting districts in
Turnout62.7%
Voters on the roll3 035
South Africa · Counting23 279 of 23 696 voting districts in (98.2%)
checked Latest results

Elected ward councillor ?

Mojakisane Tshepiso Jacob MokoneAfrican National Congress

Ward ballot ? · 1 815 valid votes

Hours off in Ward 3 ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages

Voting districts · 2 ?

Candidates · 15

Source: IEC certified candidate list (PDF, 16 Sept 2026)

This ward in earlier elections ?

ESP areas in this ward · 2 ?

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 1 832 · spoilt 17 · special votes 267 · All 2 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

PR ballot figures for this ward are the sum of the IEC's results for its 2 voting districts; the IEC publishes the ward ballot per ward and the PR ballot per voting district.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 2 voting districts here (1 904 of 3 035). The IEC publishes 62.9%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same ward (the ward that covered the same area then), both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 836 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2471); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 638 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1897); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (285); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960032: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 458 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1368); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960032: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 426 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960032: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (267); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960032: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960032: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960032: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960032: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960032: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960032: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960032: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960032: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960032: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960032: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960032: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960032: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960032: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960032: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960032: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960076: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 386 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960076: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (529); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960076: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960076: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960076: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960076: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960076: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960076: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960076: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960076: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960076: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960076: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960076: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 86960076: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: Maquassi Hills's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 07 Nov 2026, 07:02 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it