Maquassi Hills

special votes 5 628 · All 37 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 37 voting districts here (22 680 of 42 248). The IEC publishes 54.3%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1022 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3060); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 475 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1448); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (304); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 911 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2716); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 328 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1088); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (556); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (396); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (375); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 836 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2471); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 638 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1897); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (285); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 840 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2317); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 508 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1505); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (296); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (229); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1029 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2978); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 808 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2414); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 284 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (857); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (558); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1346 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4007); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 328 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1012); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (460); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1496 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4468); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 308 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (931); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 727 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 576 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1757); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 239 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (713); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (591); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1054 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 262 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (761); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (787); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1351 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3969); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 390 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (456); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (306); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1620 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4800); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 359 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 15:18 SAST.