Matlosana

special votes 15 018 · 124 of 129 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 124 voting districts with results so far here (91 016 of 187 950). The IEC publishes 49.0%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1877 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5613); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (709); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (571); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1381 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 376 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1051); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 247 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (775); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (323); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1666 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4655); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3751); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 362 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (640); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (483); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (615); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 724 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 390 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (580); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1864 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5549); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 396 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (511); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 151 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (469); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 767 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2086); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (497); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (437); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1036 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 368 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (582); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (495); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 941 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3228); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 277 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (969); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (539); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (358); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (668); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1232 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3630); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (537); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (483); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (389); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3921); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (607); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (594); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (276); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (295); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 797 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2453); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 402 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 296 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (944); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (579); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 207 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (632); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3890); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 481 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1458); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (763); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (292); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1503 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 232 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (716); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (540); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1294 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3842); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 680 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2017); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 289 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (877); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (644); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (252); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1918 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5608); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 750 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 590 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1856); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (694); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3066 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8781); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 595 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1990); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (643); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (363); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9355); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 673 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (578); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 780 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2286); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 720 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2069); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 275 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (820); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 274 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (881); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2049 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6023); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 549 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1681); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (617); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (263); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1312 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3942); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (756); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (603); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (379); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 688 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2065); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 258 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (766); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (507); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1442 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4308); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (725); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (480); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (331); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (333); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 480 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1443); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 817 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2446); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (526); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (449); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 997 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2987); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (845); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 234 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (710); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (480); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (296); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (427); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 772 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3428); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 372 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (600); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 462 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1394); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 447 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1285); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (470); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (427); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 871 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2622); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 404 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 376 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (502); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (427); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (287); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1589 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4441); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 885 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2885); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (591); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1043 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 266 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (779); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (415); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (263); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1721 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4526); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 379 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (696); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (470); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 969 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2903); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 444 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1252); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (497); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (252); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3598); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 350 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (957); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (591); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (569); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 824 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2518); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 383 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 336 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (998); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (378); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (509); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (367); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 36: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1349 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4070); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 505 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1511); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 241 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (757); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (378); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (358); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1334 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3853); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (652); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (473); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2765 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8074); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 643 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2037); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 258 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (797); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 21:36 SAST.