Moses Kotane

Ward 1: ANC 50.7%Ward 2: 6 of 7 voting districts in, ANC 58.3% so farWard 3: ANC 51.7%Ward 4: ANC 48.8%Ward 5: ANC 58.5%Ward 6: 8 of 9 voting districts in, ANC 71.4% so farWard 7: Independent 43.6%Ward 8: ANC 53.0%Ward 9: 3 of 4 voting districts in, EFF 29.6% so farWard 10: EFF 47.5%Ward 11: ANC 66.4%Ward 12: ANC 41.8%Ward 13: ANC 68.0%Ward 14: ANC 56.4%Ward 15: ANC 36.1%Ward 16: 2 of 3 voting districts in, ANC 43.1% so farWard 17: ANC 58.2%Ward 18: ANC 71.5%Ward 19: 2 of 3 voting districts in, ANC 47.7% so farWard 20: ANC 49.8%Ward 21: ANC 58.1%Ward 22: ANC 61.5%Ward 25: ANC 48.7%Ward 26: ANC 57.7%Ward 28: ANC 41.6%Ward 29: ANC 45.6%Ward 30: 2 of 3 voting districts in, ANC 45.3% so farWard 31: 2 of 3 voting districts in, PURPLE 45.5% so farWard 32: ANC 68.2%Ward 33: ANC 36.7%Ward 34: 4 of 5 voting districts in, ANC 67.9% so farWard 35: ANC 38.4%Ward 23: ANC 47.2%Ward 24: ANC 51.2%Ward 27: 6 of 7 voting districts in, ANC 52.7% so far
WardsANC 31EFF 2Independent 1PURPLE 1Partly counted 9darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2000 Ward 24 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

ANC 50.4%

Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · Ward ballot
  • ANC 50.4%
  • EFF 15.3%
  • DA 5.9%
  • Others 28.4%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Moses Kotane147 of 156 voting districts in
26 of 35 wards complete
Turnout so far42.3%
Voters on the roll so far137k
South Africa · Counting22 968 of 23 696 voting districts in (96.9%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 51 972 valid votes

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Moses Kotane vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Moses Kotane ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power24hours off3 outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages
May: 0 hours off0MayJun · Power: 9 hours offJun: 9 hours off9JunJul: 0 hours off0JulAug · Power: 15 hours offAug: 15 hours off15AugSep: 0 hours off0SepOct: 0 hours off0Oct

2000 Ward 24, Mankwe-Madikwe in 2026 ?

Wards · 35

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 4 709 · 147 of 156 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 147 voting districts with results so far here (53 044 of 125 351). The IEC publishes 39.0%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3675); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 463 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1542); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1521: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2002: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 685 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 371 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 790 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2407); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 299 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (789); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (341); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (273); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1521: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1817: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 727 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 300 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (880); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (818); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 752 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2307); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (478); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (379); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1521: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1817: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 762 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2455); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (559); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (865); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (391); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (733); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1521: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1817: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 930 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2742); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 242 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (730); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (417); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (378); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (233); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1521: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1817: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 349 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 343 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1370); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (610); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (556); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (277); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1817: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 976 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2812); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 806 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2461); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1521: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3547); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 455 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1294); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 713 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 424 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (523); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (399); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1521: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2002: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 679 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1903); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (328); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2002: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 845 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2497); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (537); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (302); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (333); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 646 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1930); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 369 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1090); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (419); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (434); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (372); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (362); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1521: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 535 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 234 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (663); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (328); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (422); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (294); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2002: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1817: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 918 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2736); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (710); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1521: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3651); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (278); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (263); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2002: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1817: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 348 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1729); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (544); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2002: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 993 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2964); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 532 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1604); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (276); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1817: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 992 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3008); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 394 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 957 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2863); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (510); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1521: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 681 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (592); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (543); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2002: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 664 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2019); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (451); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (412); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (233); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1521: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 831 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2608); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (536); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1521: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2002: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 939 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2651); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 253 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (765); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1521: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1817: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 829 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2486); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 299 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (907); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (358); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 603 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1978); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (449); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (439); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (220); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1521: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2002: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 805 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2679); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (709); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (618); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (305); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1521: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2002: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1817: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 558 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1977); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 211 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (608); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (703); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (363); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1521: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1817: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 500 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1425); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 424 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1672); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (587); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 848 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2477); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (295); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 652 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1932); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (705); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (680); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (448); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (455); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (460); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1883: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 548 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1806); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 600 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1817); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (684); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (438); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (408); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: the IEC's published turnout for this municipality is 38.99%; its own counts give 42.32% (PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in its voting districts); we show the calculated figure.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 23:36 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it