Naledi

special votes 2 574 · All 41 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 41 voting districts here (19 100 of 37 629). The IEC publishes 52.5%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1433 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4632); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 297 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1082); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (496); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 991 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2978); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 337 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1013); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (656); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (583); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (392); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 869 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2605); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 582 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1729); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 260 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (783); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (423); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1602 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4828); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 309 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (613); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 309 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (979); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (418); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (401); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 602 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1993); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 895 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2797); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (435); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (417); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (267); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 955 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2849); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (732); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (532); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3891); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 486 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (960); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (552); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (342); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (269); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 584 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1789); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (509); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2081: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (351); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (505); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 11:07 SAST.