Ratlou

special votes 2 592 · All 70 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 70 voting districts here (25 926 of 56 008). The IEC publishes 46.6%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3453); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (798); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (603); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (642); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (405); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (411); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (267); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 841 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2566); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 239 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (777); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (494); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (426); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (423); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (368); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 693 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2084); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 389 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1096); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (413); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (364); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3753); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 819 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 215 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (623); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (418); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 747 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2261); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 615 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1853); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1017 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2995); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 443 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (351); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (492); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (390); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (286); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 947 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2820); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (808); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (386); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3834); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (578); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (337); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3689); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (483); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (371); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (279); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 925 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2714); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 343 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1019); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 290 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (817); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (337); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1029 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3033); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 399 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (474); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (367); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 812 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (454); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (338); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1070 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 373 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1090); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (279); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 12:19 SAST.