DA 48.3%
Leading on the DC 40% ballot so far (provisional)
- DA 48.3%
- ANC 44.4%
- VF PLUS 2.7%
- Others 4.6%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
DC 40% ballot ? · 6 032 valid votes
DADemocratic Alliance2 91248.3%
ANCAfrican National Congress2 67744.4%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1642.7%
PAPatriotic Alliance1612.7%
KSRKhoisan Revolution360.6%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters320.5%
PMCPeople's Movement for Change200.3%
COPECongress of the People80.1%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement60.1%- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement60.1%
- RESTORSARestoration SA60.1%
- RTCRise Tsantsabane Communities20.0%
- SACPSouth African Communist Party10.0%
- HFTFHope for the Future10.0%
ESP app
How long is the queue?
Chat about the election in your area
ESP app
How did Dawid Kruiper vote?
Get notified when it's declared
Hours off in Dawid Kruiper ?
Reported in the ESP app
Wards · 17
- Ward 111 of 4 voting districts inDA 59.4%
- Ward 141 of 5 voting districts inDA 73.4%
- Ward 1613 of 14 voting districts inANC 49.1%
- Ward 174 of 6 voting districts inANC 49.8%
- Ward 1Not in yet
- Ward 2Not in yet
- Ward 3–
- Ward 4Not in yet
- Ward 5Not in yet
- Ward 6Not in yet
- Ward 7Not in yet
- Ward 8Not in yet
- Ward 9Not in yet
- Ward 10Not in yet
- Ward 12–
- Ward 13Not in yet
- Ward 15Not in yet
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 1 222 · 22 of 57 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 22 voting districts with results so far here (3 901 of 9 756). The IEC publishes 40.0%.
The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (370); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (626); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (711); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (313); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 786 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2361); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 706 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2101); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1042 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3113); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1004 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3039); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:41 SAST.