No majority
ANC and DA 14 seats each of 33 · 17 for a majority
Most ward votes: DA 41.6%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 39 186 valid votes
DADemocratic Alliance16 30141.6%
ANCAfrican National Congress16 22241.4%
PAPatriotic Alliance4 15010.6%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus9052.3%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters5061.3%
PMCPeople's Movement for Change3350.9%- RESTORSARestoration SA2710.7%
KSRKhoisan Revolution1850.5%- SACPSouth African Communist Party1380.4%
COPECongress of the People520.1%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party510.1%- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement370.1%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement310.1%- IndependentIndependent candidates20.0%
Council seats · 33 ?
- African National Congress9 ward · 5 PR14
- Democratic Alliance8 ward · 6 PR14
- Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 4 PR4
- Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1
Hours off in Dawid Kruiper ?
Reported in the ESP app
2011 Ward 3, KHARA HAIS in 2026 ?
No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.
Wards · 17
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 7 262 · All 57 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 57 voting districts here (39 525 of 65 149). The IEC publishes 61.2%.
Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 945 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2859); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 784 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2289); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 418 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1257); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1041 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3125); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 722 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2178); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 362 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1078); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 860 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2623); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 783 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2317); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (654); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 934 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2763); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 767 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2334); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (631); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 681 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2052); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 590 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1762); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 489 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1480); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1195 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3733); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 247 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (712); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (373); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (334); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3388); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 569 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1768); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (355); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1669 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4924); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 524 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1576); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (594); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2009 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5998); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (853); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (372); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 879 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2643); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 744 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2216); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (752); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1524 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4591); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3141); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (333); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (286); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1284 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3843); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3593); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (645); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1363 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4081); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (762); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (321); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1482 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4463); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 817 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2471); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (472); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3483); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 971 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2928); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 769 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2332); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3651); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 761 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2269); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1048 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3131); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1034 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3129); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 14:01 SAST.