Dawid Kruiper

Get the app
Ward 1: DA 42.9%Ward 2: DA 46.6%Ward 4: ANC 46.9%Ward 5: ANC 37.4%Ward 6: ANC 68.4%Ward 7: ANC 57.0%Ward 8: DA 64.8%Ward 9: DA 79.7%Ward 10: DA 45.2%Ward 11: DA 50.3%Ward 12: ANC 44.7%Ward 13: ANC 69.4%Ward 14: ANC 56.8%Ward 15: DA 37.9%Ward 16: ANC 58.1%Ward 17: ANC 49.2%Ward 3: DA 44.9%
WardsANC 9DA 8darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2011 Ward 3 (2011 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

No majority

ANC and DA 14 seats each of 33 · 17 for a majority

Most ward votes: DA 41.6%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Dawid KruiperAll 57 voting districts in
All 17 wards complete
Turnout60.7%
Voters on the roll65 149
South Africa · Counting22 823 of 23 696 voting districts in (96.3%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 39 186 valid votes

Council seats · 33 ?

  1. African National Congress9 ward · 5 PR14
  2. Democratic Alliance8 ward · 6 PR14
  3. Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 4 PR4
  4. Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Dawid Kruiper ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power71hours off9 outages
Water16hours off2 outages
Internet0hours offNo outages
May · Water: 16 hours offMay: 16 hours off16MayJun · Power: 23 hours offJun: 23 hours off23JunJul · Power: 20 hours offJul: 20 hours off20JulAug: 0 hours off0AugSep: 0 hours off0SepOct · Power: 28 hours offOct: 28 hours off28Oct

2011 Ward 3, KHARA HAIS in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 17

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 7 262 · All 57 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 57 voting districts here (39 525 of 65 149). The IEC publishes 61.2%.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 945 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2859); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 784 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 418 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1041 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 722 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2178); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 362 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1078); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 860 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2623); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 783 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2317); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (654); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 934 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2763); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 767 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2334); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (631); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 681 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2052); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 590 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1762); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 489 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1480); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1195 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3733); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 247 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (712); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (334); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3388); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 569 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1768); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (355); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1669 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4924); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 524 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1576); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (594); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2009 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5998); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (853); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (372); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 879 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2643); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 744 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (752); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1524 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4591); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3141); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (333); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (286); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1284 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3843); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3593); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (645); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1363 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4081); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (762); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (321); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1482 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4463); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 817 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2471); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (472); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3483); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 971 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2928); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 769 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2332); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3651); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 761 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2269); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1048 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1034 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 14:01 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it