WardsANC 8darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2011 Ward 3 (2011 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

ANC majority

8 of 15 seats

Most ward votes: ANC 42.0%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

DikgatlongAll 29 voting districts in

All 8 wards complete

Turnout60.1%

Voters on the roll24 041

South Africa · Counting23 039 of 23 696 voting districts in (97.2%)

checked 00:32Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 14 319 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress6 01742.0%
DRCDikgatlong Residents Convention3 46224.2%
DADemocratic Alliance1 49910.5%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters1 2498.7%
PAPatriotic Alliance8646.0%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus3952.8%
SACPSouth African Communist Party3162.2%
D.I.FDikgatlong Independed Forum1781.2%
IndependentIndependent candidates1360.9%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party680.5%
GOOD490.3%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement490.3%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement200.1%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party170.1%

Council seats · 15 ?

African National Congress8 ward · 0 PR8
Dikgatlong Residents Convention0 ward · 3 PR3
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1
Democratic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1
Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Dikgatlong ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power7hours off1 outage

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2011 Ward 3, Dikgatlong in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 8

On EskomSePush

DikgatlongPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 2 150 · All 29 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 29 voting districts here (14 454 of 24 041). The IEC publishes 60.5%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 881 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2657); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 640 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1865); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (416); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 646 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1856); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 634 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1970); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 352 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1036); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (396); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (351); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1655: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 794 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2410); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 675 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1971); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (639); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1655: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 575 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1771); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 341 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1015); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1655: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (293); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (305); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2168: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 694 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2072); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 507 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1478); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 247 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (744); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 232 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (698); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (357); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1655: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 776 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 339 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1011); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (667); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (625); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (264); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1655: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 756 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 282 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (832); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 276 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (822); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (485); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 895 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2680); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1969: the IEC's cross-ballot total 326 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (953); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 258 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (787); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (294); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1655: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1965: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 10:05 SAST.