WardsANC 6DA 2darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2011 Ward 3 (2011 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

ANC 6 of 15 seats · 8 for a majority

Most ward votes: ANC 41.8%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

EMTHANJENIAll 28 voting districts in

All 8 wards complete

Turnout56.1%

Voters on the roll24 737

South Africa · Counting22 398 of 23 696 voting districts in (94.5%)

checked 20:55Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 13 617 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress5 68641.8%
DADemocratic Alliance3 27024.0%
PAPatriotic Alliance2 96921.8%
SACPSouth African Communist Party6404.7%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters6394.7%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus2531.9%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement780.6%
IndependentIndependent candidates390.3%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party390.3%
DBOKKE40.0%

Council seats · 15 ?

African National Congress6 ward · 0 PR6
Democratic Alliance2 ward · 2 PR4
Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 3 PR3
South African Communist Party0 ward · 1 PR1
Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in EMTHANJENI ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power56hours off7 outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2011 Ward 3, EMTHANJENI in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 8

On EskomSePush

EmthanjeniPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 459 · All 28 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 28 voting districts here (13 869 of 24 737). The IEC publishes 56.2%.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 596 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1765); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 594 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1786); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 561 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1673); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 794 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 452 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1368); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 437 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1294); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 865 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2669); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 335 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1049); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (599); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2026: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 716 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 291 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (887); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 230 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (685); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (259); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 805 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2458); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 447 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (757); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2026: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 920 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2752); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 431 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1292); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 351 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1036); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (309); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 959 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2876); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 712 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 318 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (945); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (265); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 619 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1844); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 335 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (997); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (563); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (369); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (353); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2026: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:17 SAST.