GA-SEGONYANA

special votes 5 602 · All 48 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 48 voting districts here (36 548 of 69 842). The IEC publishes 52.9%.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1606 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4756); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (776); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (513); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1875 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5660); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 361 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (967); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 227 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (700); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (499); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1521 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4485); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 583 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1790); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 542 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1562); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 374 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1020); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (256); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 951 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2884); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 710 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2096); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 414 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1241); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 265 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (747); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (434); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 984 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2962); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 572 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1741); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 463 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1380); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 281 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (861); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (425); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1095 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3286); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 238 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (721); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (488); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 757 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2331); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 356 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 277 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (802); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (383); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (350); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 606 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1833); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 509 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1541); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 474 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1383); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (495); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1312 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3770); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 308 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (965); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 232 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (732); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (484); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3749); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 558 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1649); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 306 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (895); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (615); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (350); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (317); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1544 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4642); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 473 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1423); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 329 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1012); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (765); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 224 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (683); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1078 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 519 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1547); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 427 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1097 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2948); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 587 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1765); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 482 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1457); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (377); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 940 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2808); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 440 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1374); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 379 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1096); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 245 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (752); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (455); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:40 SAST.