WardsDA 4ANC 4darker = bigger win

Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the PR ballot per ward

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

DA 6 of 15 seats · 8 for a majority

Most party (PR) votes: DA 41.2% · up 6.4 pts from 34.8% in 2021

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

GAMAGARAAll 18 voting districts in

All 8 wards complete

Turnout58.7%

Voters on the roll34 984

South Africa · Counting19 876 of 23 696 voting districts in (83.9%)

checked 13:38Latest results

PR ballot ? · 20 352 valid votes

DADemocratic Alliance8 38641.2%
ANCAfrican National Congress6 36431.3%
GCFGamagara Community Forum1 7368.5%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters1 6908.3%
JTGRJohn Taolo Gaetsewe Re Ikemetse5832.9%
SACPSouth African Communist Party5552.7%
PAPatriotic Alliance5132.5%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus2031.0%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party1910.9%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement760.4%
AHCAfrican Heart Congress360.2%
SARKOSouth African Royal Kingdoms Organization140.1%
CCCNational Coloured Congress50.0%

Council seats · 15 ?

Democratic Alliance4 ward · 2 PR6
African National Congress4 ward · 1 PR5
South African Communist Party0 ward · 1 PR1
Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
Gamagara Community Forum0 ward · 1 PR1
John Taolo Gaetsewe Re Ikemetse0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in GAMAGARA ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power59hours off6 outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

Wards · 8

On EskomSePush

GamagaraPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 4 640 · All 18 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 18 voting districts here (20 546 of 34 984). The IEC publishes 59.3%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1932 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5747); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (383); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3281 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9601); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1291 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3785); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 566 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1719); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (320); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (340); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (279); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 823 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2469); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 491 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1478); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 371 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1088); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1297 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3834); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 863 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2577); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (490); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 830 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2451); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 554 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1664); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 477 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1454); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 428 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 354 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1065); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 311 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (923); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 720 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (645); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1377 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4084); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 626 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1895); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 150 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (455); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (422); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 721 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 609 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1799); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (544); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1492: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 11:41 SAST.