WardsANC 5DA 2darker = bigger win

Dashed: 2011 Ward 3 (2011 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

ANC and DA 5 seats each of 13 · 7 for a majority

Most ward votes: ANC 42.5%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

HANTAMAll 23 voting districts in

All 7 wards complete

Turnout60.8%

Voters on the roll14 784

South Africa · Counting22 726 of 23 696 voting districts in (95.9%)

checked 22:33Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 8 949 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress3 79942.5%
DADemocratic Alliance3 28036.7%
PAPatriotic Alliance1 04811.7%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus6166.9%
PMCPeople's Movement for Change981.1%
COPECongress of the People280.3%
NCMNamakwa Civic Movement260.3%
OHMOrganic Humanity Movement220.2%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters170.2%
SACPSouth African Communist Party150.2%

Council seats · 13 ?

African National Congress5 ward · 0 PR5
Democratic Alliance2 ward · 3 PR5
Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 2 PR2
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in HANTAM ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

2011 Ward 3, HANTAM in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 7

On EskomSePush

HantamPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 433 · All 23 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 23 voting districts here (8 988 of 14 784). The IEC publishes 61.1%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 533 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1593); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 437 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1323); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (582); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (452); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 474 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1426); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 344 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1022); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (421); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (346); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 730 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 715 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 674 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2013); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 656 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1975); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (368); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 572 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1708); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 540 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1680); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (657); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 662 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1991); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 375 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 250 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (742); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (632); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (502); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (355); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (309); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 06:46 SAST.