Joe Morolong

special votes 5 037 · All 85 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 85 voting districts here (33 204 of 59 447). The IEC publishes 56.2%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3546); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 662 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1970); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1266 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3764); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 821 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2436); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1419 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4306); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 294 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (898); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (414); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (207); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 976 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2811); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 336 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1029); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 311 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (908); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (708); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (383); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1146 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3421); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 731 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 352 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1086); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 268 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (820); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1355 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4047); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1090 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3360); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 870 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2682); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 239 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (642); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 836 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2443); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 794 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2457); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 926 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2962); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 306 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1093); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 262 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (769); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (480); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 98 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (369); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3360); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 370 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (726); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 259 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (770); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (347); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (276); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 958 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2885); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 285 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (854); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (575); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (307); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 777 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2326); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 332 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (953); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (565); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (500); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (374); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3613); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (672); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 214 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (674); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (302); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3354); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 350 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1087); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 286 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (855); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (381); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1444 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4333); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 502 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1559); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 258 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (752); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (348); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1103: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 10:58 SAST.