WardsANC 7DA 3darker = bigger win

Wards coloured by the Ward ballot: the IEC doesn't publish the DC 40% ballot per ward

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

No majority

ANC 8 of 19 seats · 10 for a majority

Most DC 40% votes: ANC 40.0% · down 5.8 pts from 45.8% in 2021

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

KAI !GARIBAll 43 voting districts in

All 10 wards complete

Turnout55.6%

Voters on the roll34 997

South Africa · Counting22 670 of 23 696 voting districts in (95.7%)

checked 22:18Latest results

DC 40% ballot ? · 19 260 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress7 70940.0%
DADemocratic Alliance5 23227.2%
PAPatriotic Alliance2 20111.4%
SACPSouth African Communist Party1 5257.9%
HFTFHope for the Future1 4177.4%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus7283.8%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters2951.5%
PMCPeople's Movement for Change450.2%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement270.1%
COPECongress of the People240.1%
RESTORSARestoration SA230.1%
KSRKhoisan Revolution160.1%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement140.1%
RTCRise Tsantsabane Communities40.0%

Council seats · 19 ?

African National Congress7 ward · 1 PR8
Democratic Alliance3 ward · 2 PR5
South African Communist Party0 ward · 2 PR2
Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 2 PR2
Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1
Hope for the Future0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in KAI !GARIB ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power38hours off5 outages

Water0hours offNo outages

Internet0hours offNo outages

Wards · 10

On EskomSePush

Kai !GaribPower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 911 · All 43 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 43 voting districts here (19 462 of 34 997). The IEC publishes 56.3%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 741 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2252); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 395 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (337); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 945 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2958); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 417 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 319 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (848); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 881 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2748); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 661 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2014); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (611); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (660); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (428); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 725 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 517 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1644); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 283 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (582); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (303); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 699 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2075); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 623 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1916); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 503 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1516); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (399); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1205 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3541); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 426 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 300 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (957); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 289 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (860); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 699 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 651 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1897); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 301 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (909); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 266 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (794); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (328); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 893 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2664); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 692 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2092); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (597); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (321); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (276); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 610 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1822); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 570 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1694); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 512 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1550); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1061: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1936: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1960: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 690 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2045); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 309 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (913); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (560); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1664: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 21:40 SAST.