No majority
ANC 5 of 11 seats · 6 for a majority
Most ward votes: ANC 44.9% · down 7.4 pts from 52.3% in 2021
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 5 090 valid votes
ANCAfrican National Congress2 28544.9%
DADemocratic Alliance1 65932.6%
PMCPeople's Movement for Change3867.6%
PAPatriotic Alliance3316.5%- NCMNamakwa Civic Movement1553.0%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1192.3%
NEFNational Economic Fighters771.5%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters611.2%- SACPSouth African Communist Party150.3%
IRASAIndependent Ratepayers Association of SA20.0%
Council seats · 11 ?
- African National Congress2 ward · 3 PR5
- Democratic Alliance4 ward · 0 PR4
- Patriotic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1
- People's Movement for Change0 ward · 1 PR1
Hours off in KAMIESBERG ?
Reported in the ESP app
Wards · 6
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 667 · All 16 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 16 voting districts here (5 176 of 7 715). The IEC publishes 67.2%.
The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.
Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 274 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (833); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 272 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (843); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (364); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 377 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1054); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 326 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (996); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 392 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1166); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (380); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 650 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1972); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (380); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 506 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1519); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 350 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1058); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 300 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (936); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 295 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (909); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (240); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 04:50 SAST.