Ward 2

Get the app
Voting district 65910045: ANC 49.7% (PR ballot)Voting district 65990021: ANC 37.7% (PR ballot)Voting district 65990043: DA 80.0% (PR ballot)Voting district 65990065: DA 76.5% (PR ballot)Voting district 65990087: DA 88.2% (PR ballot)Volle Evangelie Kerk (VD 65910045)Newlands Oasis (VD 65990021)Kareebos (VD 65990043)Rus En Vrede Farm (VD 65990065)Swartbaadjie 1 (VD 65990087)
Voting districtsDA 3ANC 2darker = bigger win
Dots: voting stations
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too
200020062011201620212026

ANC 44.1%up 1.7 pts from 42.4% in 2021

African National Congress · won the ward ballot

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

This wardAll 5 voting districts in
Turnout71.5%
Voters on the roll1 309
South Africa · Counting19 280 of 23 696 voting districts in (81.4%)
checked Latest results

Elected ward councillor ?

Joanett Jonathan ClaasensAfrican National Congress

Ward ballot ? · 929 valid votes

  1. ANCAfrican National Congress41044.1%
  2. KCMKareeberg Civic Movement17518.8%
  3. EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters14815.9%
  4. DADemocratic Alliance14415.5%
  5. VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus262.8%
  6. PAPatriotic Alliance262.8%

Hours off in Ward 2 ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages

Voting districts · 5 ?

Candidates · 6

  • Joanett Jonathan ClaasensAfrican National Congress
  • Esau HoornDemocratic Alliance
  • Yvette Mariaan NeelsEconomic Freedom Fighters
  • Denzil Macpherson Earl IsaacsKareeberg Civic Movement
  • Armstrong Marshall Jacues HugoPatriotic Alliance
  • Pieter Nicholaas BothaVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus

Source: IEC certified candidate list (PDF, 16 Sept 2026)

This ward in earlier elections ?

ESP areas in this ward · 2 ?

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 936 · spoilt 7 · special votes 0 · All 5 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

PR ballot figures for this ward are the sum of the IEC's results for its 5 voting districts; the IEC publishes the ward ballot per ward and the PR ballot per voting district.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 5 voting districts here (936 of 1 309). The IEC publishes 71.5%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same ward (the ward that covered the same area then), both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 410 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1657: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (350); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (461); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (481); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2026: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910045: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 359 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910045: party 1657: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (285); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910045: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (393); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910045: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910045: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910045: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910045: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910045: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910045: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910045: party 1634: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65910045: party 2026: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65990021: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65990021: party 1657: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65990021: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65990021: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65990021: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65990021: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65990021: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65990021: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65990021: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65990043: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65990043: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65990043: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65990043: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65990065: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65990065: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65990065: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65990087: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65990087: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: voting district 65990087: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: KAREEBERG's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 12:19 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it